this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
100 points (95.5% liked)
Asklemmy
51229 readers
165 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I feel like non native users are often better at both formulating themselves and spelling, compared to many native speakers
Especially the part where people replace 'have' with 'of'. (Would of instead of would have / would've)
Non native speaker here too btw
Oh boy, I got so confused when I was a beginner and some American kid told me "would of" is an alternative to "would have"
There are a lot of regional things as well as slang that aren't universal between native english speakers. Your confusion is kinda like how some new drivers can be better than veteran drivers because the information is still fresh and they haven't developed bad habits yet. Even as a native speaker, you'll sometimes be confused with terminology from other areas.
Examples would be stuff like "fanny" meaning something different in north America compared to Britain. "Cunt" is a lot less offensive in Australia than America. "Bless your heart" is slightly more insulting in the south than the rest of the states. Calling someone "buddy" is friendlier in Canada than the states etc.
I think the "proper" way to simplify it is would've, which is pronounced the same as 'would of'
A lot of mistakes have just become incorporated into the language in the past. Maybe 'would of' is just too blatantly wrong for that to ever happen though
Maybe not really a 'mistake', more of a normal shortening but my personal favorite english-ism is "bye" being descended directly from "god be with you". People just kept collapsing it more and more over time.
Edit: also "a pease" -> "peas" -> "a pea"
Also literally... If can both mean exactly something or be used for emphasis
"i did it on accident" blows my mind. It's by accident, not on accident.