TheReanuKeeves

joined 4 days ago
[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

What is camel comparable to?

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

I can't disagree with that

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago (1 children)

Moral obligation. Yes I am in that constant cycle of setting boundaries, having them crossed, and forgiving them because they have noone else to care for them. I don't see giving up as an option on the matter but I know I'm sacrificing my mental health for them.

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago (3 children)

That's more useful than you know for someone I'm currently dealing with. I consider myself patient but everyone has their limits, how do you help someone who is defiant, seek control, and clearly anxious without letting them tear your mood apart?

I know I'm supposed to understand they are acting out of confused defense but it's truly difficult to be the caregiver to someone who is essentially throwing an illogical temper tantrum nearly 24/7?

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 1 points 42 minutes ago

I don't think I've ever had "good" turkey so I would put it at the bottom of my poultry, goose is definitely fatty but I consider it like the wagyu of poultry. Duck is in the middle but still more decadent than chicken. Squab is near the top as well.

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

Let me put it this way. If your family was 1 of 2 surviving families on earth for whatever reason and all the resources have run out. You're stuck in an underground bunker and unfortunately your only option for survival is cannibalism (this is a common thought exercise in philosophy) are you more willing to eat your family? Or the other?

And what about towards the end, when it's just you and one other person. Do you override your survival instinct and offer yourself up, or do you start reasoning to yourself that this is a necessary evil?

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago (5 children)

Been a while since psych and I'm sure some terms I use are outdated now but the way it was explained to me was that sociopaths feel some guilt and remorse but do it anyways whereas psychopaths don't feel any remorse at all. I think symptoms of both have been melded into ASPD in general now but the logic applies. If someone is capable of lying and manipulating without remorse (my original statement) then it would be a very low chance that they see others as equals

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Someone wrote beans so you're ok

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Everyone knows his body was a double and Hitler fled to Argentina where he changed his name to Mateo González to pursue a career in dog breeding and pastries for diabetics

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (7 children)

People with low empathy don't see people as companions, but more as tools to benefit themselves. So they don't really care as long as they have enough money and pawns to take care of themselves.

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Nothing like a mouth full of manflesh

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

I'll eat one them mufuggas for my boy Steve

 

A nice roasted duck gets my mouth leaking like an old galvanized pipe that you didn't realize was rotting from the inside out

view more: next ›