this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
188 points (99.0% liked)

Cybersecurity

8651 readers
145 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Community Rules

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Laser@feddit.org 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not sure the term applies to MS Teams. It was always a rushed shitty product, pushed onto customers during COVID when companies like Zoom gained tons of users. Few people if any asked for it

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They literally added an "Upgrade to Premium" button a few weeks ago. Yes, it applies to Teams

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know anyone that doesn't use their company teams in the company computer. We don't see any upgrade to premium because we do have the premium.

The main experience of teams is the corporate word, idk if they are enshittifying their main user base.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My company uses our company teams on our company computers, and we do have the "Upgrade to Premium" button, even though our company pays for Teams.

Though I guess it's a great filter - who'd wanna be part of a company that's stupid enough to pay extra for "Teams Premium"?

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Uh, I'd think reverse. I don't really want to work in a company that forces me to use a tool where they haven't negotiated enshittification away. They don't pay for the premium features as extra, they usually have commercial licensed on a per user basis and that covers everything.

I wouldn't mind on a small startup where they obviously have pirates windows, but if the consultant firms I have worked don't provide me a non enshittfied experience of the tools I'm forced to use I'd raise hell.

Btw, thanks for reminding me, the client we work for blocked extensions in Firefox, edge and Chrome. Gotta raise hell until I get them back.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait, you'd seriously throw a tantrum because you don't have useless AI features enabled? That's sad.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

No, I'd throw a tantrum if I saw the button. I'd want the basics covered and then no visual of any "enable moar" features. Way to misunderstand my post qq

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I push for open source whenever I can, but in the end, I'm forced to use teams and this isn't a bad feature imo.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Emails are slow and bothersome, and I can't edit them. Long email chains get very confusing as well in my experience, group chats between a few people are easier to handle.

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

They're not confusing if people don't top-post or include miles of signatures.