News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Thats a lot of words to not say yes . . .
Read like a “yes, and…” reply to me…
If a politician doesn't explicitly say yes in response to a direct question I wouldn't interpret that as a yes, nor would I expect anyone to interpret that as such. Thats how they operate.
Her answer was insightful enough to know that Schumer leaving could mean you just get Schumer 2.0. The problem is bigger than one person. Schumer should go, yeah, but more importantly—the problem (of which Schumer is a manifestation) should go. Fight for change, not a facade thereof.
What if the response in stead of saying “Yes” to “should Chuck Schumer be removed?” actually tells people how to accomplish it? Still doesn’t count as a “Yes”?
Shes one of the people who has the power to do it, and yet she refuses to say she'd do it.
If im a fireman and you ask me if im gonna put out a fire in your house and instead of saying yes I tell you how a fire extinguisher works, you gonna assume that means I'm gonna help you put it out?
She's in the House, Schumer is in the Senate. It'd be like asking a fireman to put out a fire while he and his truck are two counties over, and complaining when they tell you to get help from your local fire station instead.
Or like asking an EMT to help you put out a fire, and when they point out they're an EMT, indignantly scoffing and calling them a "spineless establishment first responder."
The key here is she can’t do it by herself. She doesn’t have the votes.
The better analogy would be if you were the fireman organizing the bucket brigade.
I don't see how she has that power.
Only for people who can fit their whole brains into 140 characters
She has to tread lightly. The Dems may be spineless when dealing with the GOP, but they're ruthless with their own.
Has treding lightly made the establishmemt dems give her better positions, or are they still stuffing cancerous old white men in slots she should have had?
She's not gathering more enemies, at least. I imagine she'll have to deal with the cancerous reps in some shape or form.
It's the same issue in both cases. A dem that fights like a Republican would take over the party.
And it's pretty clear that whoever is giving the media its narrative spinning instructions, (which again, the original narrative was a call for Schumer to immediately resign) has somebody in mind already to replace him, and it's definitely not going to be anyone better like Sanders, Warren, or Wyden.
Schumer resigning as minority leader wouldnt change one damn thing.
The only resignation that would matter would be from his Senate seat, and while Hochul has some progressive bonna fides from her endorsement of Mamdani I dont think there's a good choice for an appointed senator who could make much of a difference.
Maybe someone like Zephyr Teachout, but I'm not sure she'd want the job or that Hochul would pick her.
(And if AOC herself wants the job, I'd want her to get the benefit of winning a statewide dem primary first.)
I read on another site that Schumer didn't whip the vote on that surrender, but instead told people to vote their conscience, and that this is unusual. So that sounds like something to be pissed at Schumer about. At best, he diffused responsibility for the collapse.
Given that Kahnna has been the face of all of this, I still believe there's no way that Thiel wasn't heavily involved, but if that's true it actually makes me think that the establishment forces who control the dem party were also probably pressuring Dems to vote to end the shutdown (and let's be clear here, as hard as it was on the American people it was even harder on the economy /s)
Regardless, if it's just Thiel or Thiel and others including the Dem establishment, the narrative seems pretty clear. They want Schumer gone for a reason. Even if he didn't "push back enough" to keep the party united, he definitely doesn't seem to be getting rewarded for whatever he did or didn't do.
I have been assuming it was mainly Thiel retaliating for Schumer forcing a Senate vote to release the Epstein files (the same day Wyden called for an investigation of JP Morgan's records of transactions between Thiel and Epstein) after House republicans blocked it for a second time, but Thiel definitely isn't the only big politically adjacent name being investigated with Epstein, and there are some very big names who aren't conservatives.
Thinking about who among powerful Democrats would want to retaliate because of the Epstein investigation, there are a few possibilities. It might not be a coincidence that Tim Kaine was one of the democrats to turn, given who he presumably remained somewhat close with after returning to the Senate in 2016. Presumably, since all the other Democrats who voted that way are also older/about to retire, they may all have been fairly close with the same person or her husband.
I don't remember anything about Khanna in the saga but I haven't followed super closely. Anyway, Khanna is not in the Senate so maybe there is something I'm missing altogether. But I thought this was about the Senate vote.
Kahnna was the first to immediately begin calling for Schumer to step down Sunday night, and he has been in the news non stop since then repeating the same thing over and over.
The media has been helping him push the narrative that Democrats are furious with Schumer. Yet when two of the most trustworthy Dems (AOC and Sanders) were asked directly, neither called for him to step down and both warned that this was a much bigger issue than just Schumer.
It's very odd to me that Kahnna is the one Democrat receiving all this press as he lobbies this message. My assumption has been that since Kahnna has been backed by Peter Thiel for most of his career, it would benefit Thiel for Schumer to be gone.
Sept 10: Dem Orders Congressional Probe Into Epstein and Peter Thiel’s Relationship](https://www.thedailybeast.com/ron-wyden-orders-probe-into-epstein-and-peter-thiels-relationship/)
Sept 10: Schumer moves to force Senate vote on Epstein files
Sept 10: US Senate Republicans narrowly reject Schumer bid to force vote on Epstein files
Since the House should finally have enough votes to get the Epstein files released, Thiel could potentially hope to install a Democrat that he trusts, or he could just be trying to signal to other Democrats that he has the power to end anyone's career if they try to investigate him, even someone like Schumer.
Meh, people were dragging Schumer as soon as the cave was announced. I don't think anyone needed Khanna for that. Also the Khanna-Thiel thing is new to me. I had thought Thiel was MAGA but I don't keep a scorecard.
AOC and Sanders have to be more careful about what they say, because of their larger and relatively focused audiences, and because they have to play nice with the leadership.