this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
344 points (98.9% liked)

Linux Gaming

23131 readers
226 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And it's still used together with client side cheat detection.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, scanning of it's own game files to detect anything suspicious. It doesn't scan every file on your computer, dictate what applications you can or can't run and doesn't install itself at the kernel level. I don't have a problem with that at all.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cool but this started with you saying anti chest should be server side, not that it should not be kernel level.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago

It was pretty obvious from the get go that my main concern is intrusive anti-cheat solutions.

Either way, the bulk of anti-cheat should be server yes, a basic client-side AC can exist alongside it to capture the most basic of cheats. Although entirely server side would be fine.