this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
317 points (99.4% liked)

politics

26404 readers
2681 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive article https://archive.ph/woX7H

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Coming from this fucking scheister, that's rich. Dershowitz himself is closely linked to Epstein and figures prominently in the files. Have those people no shame?

If I was him, I'd go hide somewhere as far from the US as possible. Because if anyone is even more suspiciously a pedo than Trump in the Epstein files, that would be him. And yet here he is, running his disgusting mouth. Just unbelievable...

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

*shyster* but your spelling is better.

probably from German Scheisser, literally, defecator

First Known Use 1844

I thought it derived from the character Shylock but Webster’s says no. Also for anyone who doesn’t know, please note it also can be very Jew-hatey, so there’s that.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Scheister is an accepted spelling. It's also a lot more about shit lawyers than about shit jews than shyster, which is why I always prefer using it. It's also a lot more about shit than shyness if you speak German and derivatives, which is also more in line with what I think of lawyers.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Scheister is an accepted spelling.

Not on the interwebs I can see, but would be curious to find the source for that. All the results I get back just spell it the other way.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

From Wiktionary:

shyster

English Alternative forms:

  • schister, scheister, sheister, schyster, shister, shaista, shiester, schiester
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Geez why not make jghyshter an alternative form. Worsceshesctershistershire.

https://wikidiff.com/scheister/shyster

Shyster is a alternative form of scheister.
Scheister is often a misspelling of shyster.
Scheister has no English definition.

Wacky.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, even if it's incorrect, I'll use it. One of the powers of the English language is that you can mold it to your liking and it's a-okay as long as other people understand you. And if Shakespeare can invent 1,600 words, surely I can invent a few myself 😜

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Fair enough!

Happy cromulenting!

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

And I thought it meant someone who operates a shy: a carnival attraction where you throw things at various kinds of targets in order to win a prize. The shy is one of the archetypal rigged games.

But I'm sure the dictionary compilers must know better than a yob like me.