this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
364 points (91.2% liked)

Games

44498 readers
1172 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Can everyone please stop claiming and speculating that Valve's new hardware will be loss leaders? If you watch LTT and Gamers Nexus's first videos on the announcement, they actually spoke with Valve's engineers. And the Valve representatives already said that the new hardware WILL NOT BE LOSS LEADERS.

There isn't even evidence that the Steam Deck was a loss leader. All GabeN said was that the lowest cost launch model was priced "painfully", which doesn't necessarily mean it was sold at a loss, it could easily have been sold at a very tight margin.

And no, low margins does not meet the definition of a loss leader. A loss leader is a product sold below cost, in that every unit sold actually costs the seller money.

I get the desire to speculate on new hardware. It's fun and it helps pass the time until we hear more info from Valve. But there's limits to what is reasonable. Valve has already stated that the new hardware won't be loss leaders, so hoping and/or claiming they are isn't reasonable.

Sorry for the rant, but all of the comments that seem to have only skimmed headlines are quickly getting to me

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

None of those consoles would directly boot into desktop Linux with just a few button presses.

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They actually do, they’re just locked down from factory

https://github.com/SleepTheGod/PS5_Linux_Boot/blob/main/README.md

Remember that PS2 natively supported this and modern consoles like the Switch can boot directly into desktop Linux.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I said "with a few button presses," not "after hacking it and booting from external media."

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So what you’re saying because Valve supports it out of the box is the limiting factor between a console and pc

The hardware supports it; it could be a PC if you want.

You skipped over the PS2 and how it was a console and marketed with Linux support directly from Sony

Let alone Yellow Dog Linux on the PS3

https://youtu.be/lSP9b4Qcu4M

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A clever enough person can get a useable general-purpose OS running on just about any hardware. The entire point is that it's user-friendly out of the box.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So user friendly Linux running on it makes it not a console? For a while PS3 was just a couple button presses to get a full Linux distro booted on it. I don’t think anyone would argue PS3 wasn’t a console.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, it just means a console that doesn't support booting directly into a general-purpose OS isn't a PC.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Totally agree there. MacBooks don’t even really qualify there and even probably near future when newer Windows devices come locked down.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Wrong. MacBooks can dual boot Linux (windows too on the Intel MacBooks), and you can download code from wherever and run it. There’s a terminal you can run commands in. If you want, you can completely fuck it up. macOS is worlds apart from iOS, and MacBooks are more a proper computer than probably even the Steam machine we’re discussing here.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually the current M-series are struggling to be feature complete on Linux, so while what you say was true for the Intel Macs, that is wilting away.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You can still dual boot operating systems. The fact Asahi isn’t complete yet doesn’t matter. If ARM Windows was worth a damn you could dual boot that too.

They’re computers.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The pedantic argument was about personal computer, not just computer. I believe it was along the lines of push a few buttons, not hack the OS. Sorry I made you mad talking about MacBooks.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You don’t make me mad by being wrong. You don’t have to “hack the OS” to dual boot a MacBook.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You have to hack another OS to load it on a MacBook. Try running Linux on an M3, M4, or M5 today. Not yet possible.

Edit: Even the M1 and M2 Linux support was entirely reverse engineered. The hardware is not open, it’s not a personal computer.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That’s not hacking, that’s development. They’re not bypassing locked bootloaders. If Apple pushes for making it impossible to run another operating system that’s another downgrade for sure, but you can still run whatever code you want on them, ergo, it’s a computer. It’s got a terminal, you can write and run your own code, you can download unsigned binaries, you can delete stuff and break the OS, that’s a computer.

Try running anything on an Xbox Series S/X or PS5. Locked bootloader means you’re fucked from the start, and getting past that is hacking.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That’s like saying an unlocked Pixel phone is a PC because you could technically develop an OS for it. Unlocked bootloader doesn’t an open system make.

I think we’re using different terms for hacking. You are using the exploit definition.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, that could very well be a PC. You could take the guts out, put it in a generic box, attach a monitor and peripherals, and have a Linux PC that drastically outperforms PCs of a couple decades ago, with similar functionality. Those were PCs then, why would the definition change?

Regarding the exploit definition, yeah, that’s the good one IMO. The other one is more akin to “life hacks” or “food hacks” and I think it’s silly. Using a butter knife as a screwdriver isn’t a “tool hack.” Putting Doom on a toothbrush isn’t hacking, provided no exploits were necessary. Putting Linux on a MacBook isn’t hacking just because it lacks documentation and the Asahi devs have to figure some things out before it works.

I would be curious to hear your definition of hacking, though. To me it seems if you’re calling Linux on Mac hacking, then there’s a million other things that are hacking and the word loses its meaning.

If Apple locks the bootloader then I’ll completely agree with you. And while I do agree it appears they’re heading in that direction and it sucks, a MacBook is far more “computer” than a console, even if poorly documented and thus difficult to develop for.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Hacking at the kernel to make it work on a new device is a valid definition of hacking IMO.

Hacking [something together] - building something quickly to make it work not necessarily a robust inplementation.