this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
617 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

13841 readers
2001 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please help keeping these monsters of our streets. It will save lives.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

the "newest" car i've ever owned is from 2008... are hondas and toyotas really equally as shitty as fucking dodge and chevy now?

[–] n4sdaq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think so. Their comment seems over-generalized. Sure, most modern cars are too "sporty" now which translates to being more uncomfortable in my experience. But that doesn't mean I'd lump Japanese cars in the same quality category as American cars.

[–] noodles@slrpnk.net 4 points 22 hours ago

I meant that they're all behemoths rather than quality wise! But yeah, Chevy has improved and is ok now from what I understand, the rest I wouldn't trust.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

No. They're much more reliable and generally cheaper even with the tariffs

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (5 children)

Toyota, particularly, hasn’t kept up with advances in infotainment technology. Their infotainment is literally no better than it was in 08. Honda infotainment is slightly better, but still stuck with terribly low resolution, and only a 9”ish screen. Pretty much any other company will be a better buy than those 2 right now. Remember, the infotainment in every new car is the entire heart of the car, so you’re forced to live with it; you can’t just swap out infotainment screens for something better like you used to be able to do.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I hate infotainment and technology in cars so, go Toyota!

Give me efi and maybe abs (most of my cars dont have abs anyway)

Tech Junk makes all cars more expensive and prone to failure and impossible to repair, and further pushes us to technofacist dystopia where your every move is recorded and your car can be controlled remotely (Tesla can do this already).

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 3 hours ago

9 inch infotainment is plenty. The purpose of a car is to travel, not watch SpongeBob Squarepants.

Infotainment replacements are out there, but often lack support for some specific vehicle options. If the connections were more standardized like the old radios it would certainly be nice.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Do people actually want infotainment screens?

The only thing I can think of wanting a screen for is a backup camera. I much prefer buttons when possible. I thought infotainment screens were just a way for manufacturers to save money on buttons. Why would you want one? Is there something I'm missing?

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

The bigger the screen for me, the safer it is to gaze over at directions. I wouldn’t drive without directions telling me which way is fastest. No way can a human predict traffic better than computers.

The cameras might not be “required” to drive, but they do increase precision, which in turn is safer overall.

Also, the last thing I wanna do is know my area super well, then it takes the excitement out of driving around; the engagement is helpful to keep me from being distracted.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

If cars were designed so you actually had visibility, you wouldn't Need 500 cameras just to reverse.

This is why 2000s was peak. You had most creature comforts, and tech wasn't shoved in our faces, and you could actually see out of your car.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

How do you like to get to new places? Turn by turn audio? That mixed with on-screen directions?

If you like on screen, what is the ideal screen size?

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

12” widescreen is basically my minimum >15” is ideal. I’d put a 24” in my car if I could.

[–] PedestrianError@towns.gay 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

@brbposting @Taldan Reading a paper map and looking up directions before you drive and then remembering them are critical skills that should be on driving tests.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Agreed.

Having a maps app that shows directions and current position is pretty handy in new areas, especially if there is construction or heavy traffic to avoid.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Makes me feel better doing that!

Still have to check traffic even for short trips since I refuse to waste half an hour in a jam when looking for green/red roads would’ve taken seconds :) then appreciate traffic notifications along the way

Admittedly don’t do it with paper but have enjoyed learning roads - even played a game kinda, work to home (San Francisco) where I turned right on red for each red I got, forcing me to explore new places (no GPS)

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Silly me, thinking that the engine would be the heart of a car.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

People today have no idea what engine they even have. They care more about the screen size in the interior.

Modern humans 🙄

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

What would you even need that for?

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

The engine is a part of the legs in this analogy

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 6 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

lol "heart of the car" gtfo

rear view cameras are nice (though unnecessary), but literally NOTHING else about "infotainment" is worth the extra cost. you think it is because you've been convinced you just simply can't survive without it, and cars can't even exist without it. why? because $$$

fuck outta my face with that shit

so, my takeaway from all this is that toyota is still the best way to go if you for some reason just have to buy a "infotainment" car

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Maps/navigation is the one feature that infotainment systems have that is a step up and worth a small amount of cost.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 hour ago

It will be instantly outdated.

The phone you use is going to be a far better method of navigation. Cars need a dumb screen that connects to your phone and displays the map, problem solved. Although id take all screens out of cars but kids today need a screen or they freak out I guess.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What options are there that don't have infotainment garbage without buying something that's 10 years old?

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I will not buy a car without a 15” screen. I just cannot read directions as fast on any smaller screen. The bigger the information on the screen, the faster I can read it, and the less precision I need with my gaze.

[–] Vegan_Joe@anarchist.nexus 5 points 1 day ago

I too would like to know. I'm rocking a 2012 Scion with a Toyota engine with 300,000 miles on it...

[–] noodles@slrpnk.net 2 points 22 hours ago

Sorry, I meant that they're all too huge for European roads. Quality wise it varies considerably, Chevy group has kind of stepped it up and honda/the Koreans have slipped (though miles better than Stellantis group with Dodge and jeep still).