this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
544 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

43688 readers
377 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I lowkey expect every modern device to be compromised (unless you're running custom roms). Whether it's Pegasus or something else. Only permanent solution is to stop using smartphones altogether.

[–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 week ago

Only permanent solution is to stop using smartphones altogether

Even if you can't, minimizing smartphone use, uptime and carrying mitigates some of the risk

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 week ago

Only permanent solution is to stop using smartphones altogether.

Just make sure your pagers are not backdoored with Semtex either.

[–] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you think every phone has some sort of IME, installing a custom ROM means nothing.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A phone's baseband (modem) runs its own proprietary firmware with full RAM access.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This doesn't make sense to me.
Why do they even need it to be that way?

Compartmentalisations was one of the basic points in system design methodology that I thought (because I read it somewhere) smartphones would also be built upon. So why compromise the whole thing to a supply chain attack?

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do they even need it to be that way?

so that they can surveil you

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That part, I already understand.
But you needed to have some sort of excuse for such things back when smartphones were new.

I think the compartmentalisation concepts were there from the feature-phone era.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

In exchange for giant purchase orders from the government. Qualcomm etc are simply corrupt.

[–] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It's by design.