this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2022
24 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
622 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You can append to your existing e-mail address in various ways, and this could be pretty useful for seeing who leaked your e-mail address to spammers. For example, for your bank, give them the address myaddress+banking@gamil.com. Then, if spammers send to that address, you can quickly see where they got the e-mail address from!

I've tested it with Proton Mail, and it works in exactly the same way.

See https://lifehacker.com/your-gmail-account-has-unlimited-addresses-1849809691

#technology #email #antispam #privacy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bugsmith@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I used to work for a product comparison company (think finance and insurance). We used to save the email address as typed for login and also with everything after the plus removed separately. For Gmail and certain other large providers, we also stripped out any dots e.g. a.j.uniquename@gmail.com became ajuniquename@gmail.com.

[–] GadgeteerZA@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now you can tell us who you worked for, so we can be sure to avoid them...

[–] bugsmith@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I'd rather not dox myself. They're not a huge company. I promise you that this is not something uncommon.

load more comments (2 replies)