this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
40 points (97.6% liked)

Futurology

0 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thatuserguy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Awesome, so does this mean all the rich old dudes ruining everything for everyone else get to continue to do so for longer? You just know something like this would be prohibitively expensive to the general populace. Really exciting.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Move out of the states and it'll be affordable

[–] vind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] wahming@monyet.cc 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Universal healthcare is a thing. The US is possibly the only first world exception. I live in Norway, and pay a maximum of $250 a year on medical expenses. Everything else gets covered by the govt.

[–] vind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm aware. However, things like this feel like it would be considered beauty care which generally is not considered to be applicable for universal healthcare.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Age-related symptoms and diseases are the biggest burden on healthcare infrastructure. Anything that reduces said impact would definitely fall under healthcare.

[–] vind@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, but history this doesn't support that belief. Unfortunately

[–] RatherBeMTB@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Not if you'll die. Age reversal will be a must for 80 yo people.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Given the history of medical research, we certainly owe Norway rats one.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

As long my as they’re rats, yes