this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)
Photography
6531 readers
202 users here now
A community to post about photography:
We allow a wide range of topics here including; your own images, technical questions, gear talk, photography blogs etc. Please be respectful and don't spam.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments

16k and even 8k is also a metric crap ton of data. Raw 8k @ 24 FPS is around 640 MB/second of data. Bump the frame rate and the numbers get big. Red cameras shooting 8K @ 75 fps chew just over 2 GB/second.
To be fair, I was focusing on still photography, given the community and the pictures the OP posted :)
That being said, video is often more forgiving of a slight reduction in pixel count, because noise and slight softness can get hidden behind motion blur to some extent.
Also, most action cams won't be shooting RAW video. They tend to use non colour gradable compressed formats that work straight out of the camera, and that makes the space consumption a lot more manageable.