this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
25 points (93.1% liked)

Fairvote Canada

781 readers
16 users here now

Matrix Chat


What is This Group is About?

De Quoi Parle ce Groupe?


The unofficial non-partisan Lemmy movement to bring proportional representation to all levels of government in Canada.

🗳️Voters deserve more choice and accountability from all politicians.


Le mouvement non officiel et non partisan de Lemmy visant à introduire la représentation proportionnelle à tous les niveaux de gouvernement au Canada.

🗳️Les électeurs méritent davantage de choix et de responsabilité de la part de tous les politiciens.




Related Communities/Communautés Associées

Resources/Ressources

Official Organizations/Organisations Officielles



Content Moderation Policies

We're looking for more moderators, especially those who are of French and indigenous identities.


Politiques de modération de contenu

Nous recherchons davantage de modérateurs, notamment ceux qui sont d'identité française et autochtone.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Young people already work, pay taxes, and live with the consequences of political decisions.

They deserve a voice. Send a message of support to the Senator from your province or territory!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

So they want to restrict young people's access to the internet but also expand their voting rights?

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Most of the social media bans I've seen have been for those under the age of 16.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And people under 16 often do need to talk to others. Social media can be a massive cesspit, but there are uses for it and they can be critical for some.

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Well I don't see why we would need to ban online chat for kids. That's not social media in my mind; there's no algorithmic feed.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Then we currently have a failure to communicate. Please define what is and what is not social media online. Are older PHP forums social media or not? Those were the first social media I did online and continued to be the main way I did any internet socializing for many years.

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh sorry, I mean, I think we should ban algorithmic feeds (by which I mean anything non-trivial -- they usually have "latest unreads" etc. which is fine by me.). Possibly also systems which are both (a) not dedicated to a single topic, and (b) connect at least hundreds of thousands of people, and (c) have some built-in mechanism to facilitate forwarding content from others to other people directly adjacent to you on the graph (retweeting/reblogging/etc.).

SMS, IRC, BBS, online chat -- these all predate what are known as social media and they fit all my desiderata. No non-trivial algorithmic feed, and segregated into generally smaller communities.

Bluesky, twitter (latest-from-friends), Mastodon -- I am skeptical of these, even if they have no non-trivial algorithmic feeds. While individuals will typically have less than ten thousand "friends"/"following" per se, the friend graph still forms a network which comprises millions of people. Of course, traditional systems like email are similar, so this would probably be okay if not for reblogging/retweeting/etc., which is basically a human-powered recommender system.

Twitter (under normal usage), Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, tumblr -- hard no, these fit none of the desiderata, and I think they're clearly "social media" and also clearly harmful.

YouTube and Reddit I think are acceptable if we ban the non-trivial feeds (i.e. restrict to subscriptions-only, no recommender systems, no "best", "hot", etc.)

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's fair. I have to admit, to me social media was mostly about talking to others. I didn't get into TikTok or Instagram because I didn't see that option other than to watch short form videos, which is not something I like.

[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Well I think we shouldn't ban talking to other people in general. In my mind the harmful effects of social media is not what comes from chatting with specific people you are friends with.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The senate is not a monolith.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago

They seem to be as far as stupidity goes.