this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
187 points (92.7% liked)

movies

2281 readers
468 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

... Barbie and Ken? What does that even mean in this context? Just physical appearance, or something more?

I honestly didn't even consider physical appearance, if that's what you mean. I meant the more simplistic approach to their personality. They were particularly one-note, able to offer a simple home and philosophy, but not much more. It feels very much like they were only meant for one or two scenes and are never meant to be seen again.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

… Barbie and Ken? What does that even mean in this context? Just physical appearance, or something more?

Yes they often played by pretty city people

I honestly didn’t even consider physical appearance, if that’s what you mean. I meant the more simplistic approach to their personality. They were particularly one-note, able to offer a simple home and philosophy, but not much more. It feels very much like they were only meant for one or two scenes and are never meant to be seen again.

They WERE in a scene or two... they were intended to provide a "back to centre" anchor for Superman/Clark, they were not main even supporting cast

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes they often played by pretty city people

"City People"? Is there a particular look you mean by this?

they were not main even supporting cast

Right, they weren't especially important to the plot except one or two scenes. And don't really have the emphasis that they'll be particularly important in the future, which is contrary to past incarnations. Like I said, they worked for this movie... but, especially considering the "But wait... there's more" feeling of the movie, and that it's meant as the start of a new franchise... they feel flat and rather unimportant. Which felt disappointing.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

yes...

Kevin Costner for example; or these 2

Regarding your second paragraph, I see your point. I did not really think Clark parents will have much to do in the future (they honestly have not even in the better developed and much longer animated movies). They are just (usually) moral anchor for the early years of Superman and sometimes the "escape from the city life"... I would not expect them to feature in the future films