this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
327 points (99.1% liked)

politics

26718 readers
2402 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A series of events in the past few weeks has undercut what little power Johnson ever had among his fellow Republicans in the House. GOP representatives – the group that he theoretically leads – are so angry that they publicly call him names. Republicans are using parliamentary procedures to get votes on bills that Johnson doesn’t want to bring to the floor.

Incumbents panicking over the potential to lose their seats, in a Democratic landslide, are blaming Johnson for their problems. He has to make promises he must know he can’t keep to get bills passed. And Donald Trump is doing nothing to help Johnson in his time of need.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Trump has always been somehow untouchable, but the same could never be said about Johnson, and he makes a great fall guy for everyone's ire at Trump.

But the key here is, no one in congress on either side really wants Johnson to be in line for the presidency should Trump's health issues, or pedophillia, finally catch up to him. Especially with the couch fucker around and not being popular except with Nazis.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I don't think the problem with Johnson is untouchable. I just think he's in the role because there's nobody better to replace him with.

Also, I just don't think "Trump dying in office" is a serious part of anyone's math.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Trump is 79 and lives on fast food cheeseburgers. He also appears to be on dementia slowing drugs.

Everyone has plans for if Trump croaks in office. Not having those plans is irresponsible.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Trump is 79 and lives on fast food cheeseburgers. He also appears to be on dementia slowing drugs.

He's got the best health care money can buy and a team of doctors ready to do a triple bypass at the drop of a dime.

He'll live to be 100.

Not having those plans is irresponsible.

Of course. Republicans are famous thinking long term

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

First, the best doctors in the world can't help an unwilling patient.

And again, the dementia drugs. Those are not even 50% effective. They actually sit at about 30% and that's the best we've got.

But thinking that people aren't quietly talking about what to do when Trump croaks, or can't be paraded around anymore... That's just a fantasy.

Everyone is talking about Trump's health. Well, everyone except his most delusional supporters, but they're busy photoshopping his head on a fit body.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

First, the best doctors in the world can’t help an unwilling patient.

Trump's a hypochondriac and has never been shy about taking preventative steps for his health. He was first in line for the COVID shot and first in line to get paxlovid when he became infected.

And again, the dementia drugs.

This has been the subject of endless, unverified speculation. Trump's old, not particularly smart, and regularly in meetings that leave him bored out of his mind. Its trivial to get a picture of him half-awake and drooling, then claim you can diagnose medical conditions with a cell phone camera that doctors struggle to categorize with a CAT scan.

But thinking that people aren’t quietly talking about what to do when Trump croaks

I'm not suggesting nobody is talking. I'm stating that Mike Johnson's position as House Speaker has nothing to do with his perceived capability as successor to the successor to the President. Nevermind the fact that Speaker of the House is also a powerful bureaucratic position. Why would you give a shit about Trump dropping into a coma, JD Vance getting - what? - hit by a lightning bolt, I guess? And then this thing that has never happened in 250 years of US History happening in the next three years.

Everyone is talking about Trump’s health.

Every Lib has been talking about how Trump could croak any second, because they're coked up on Copium and have zero faith in the next round of elections.

Conservatives think you could drop a bomb on Trump's head and God would step in to stop it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)