64
Matthew Yglesias did it again | No, Democrats shouldn't embrace oil and gas.
(www.climatecoloredgoggles.com)
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
I would especially want to comment about:
A country that swims in oil, and has few other natural resources of comparable value, so indeed nearly all parties support using it.
What example will he bring next, Saudi Arabia?
That aside, Norway has a huge electric vehicle adoption rate. They will sell you oil, but have themselves almost stopped using it.
Norway has tons of offshore rare earths that will likely rival the oil sector as soon as they dip into it.