this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
170 points (97.2% liked)

Canada

10814 readers
523 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] the16bitgamer@programming.dev 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'm not disagreeing. But in the example with Lockheed Martin, what else can they do? These are Military Supplies, if the Canadian Government intervenes and forces Lockheed Martin to prevent the export of the components, they will be actively aggravating the US, which is not something the Canadian Government appear they'd want to do at this time. (See Doug Ford's Regan Add)

The Canadian Government is in a loose loose situation right now if they act. If we want more immediate results we should be going after these companies who are actively supporting this genocide, while pressuring the Canadian Government to do more.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 2 days ago

Make them with failsafes. If found in Israel, self-detonate.
Then Canada has just cause to stop sending materials to the US being proxied for genocide.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Lose-lose may be true, but our government is still choosing one loss over the other. Canada can't control what the US companies do, but Canada is subject to the Arms Trade Treaty, the Genocide Convention, and the Geneva Conventions, all of which would prevent Canada from allowing these exports were they being followed. Canada created a loophole for oversight in domestic law that allows this kind of shipment. It shows the limits of the Canadian government's commitment to international law, because there is a legal basis for stopping them but the government chooses not to on the basis of economic & business interests, then chooses to mislead the public when there is public pressure.

I agree with you on going after the companies domestically and on continuing to pressure the government. It just sucks that this is so predictable from our government.