this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
127 points (97.7% liked)

Selfhosted

54252 readers
805 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I created a short tutorial on using sub domains to access services hosted within my home network, thought I would share it here in case anyone finds it useful

This is the first time I've made a technical tutorial so apologise if there are mistakes/its confusing, feedback will be appreciated

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Except it isn't. Saying it is trivial is just gross generalization. It's trivial to configure bind to have internal zones that aren't resolvable publically. It all depends on configuration, such as reverse ns entries, zone accessibility, etc.

You can have (sub)domains that are listed in the certificate lists and yet aren't resolvable externally as well.

[–] BonkTheAnnoyed@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Actually, wait. Something you a said might actually be just what I'm looking for: you mean that I can have DNS entry for mydomain.com and no additional CNAMEs, and have a cert for nextcloud.mydomain.com (or wildcard maybe?) and somehow still be able to use name based virtual servers?

Hmmm. I thought I was going to be limited to path-based.

Explain more?

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Absolutely. Simply use ACME with the DNS validation method. Using bind you'll want to create keys and allow TXT access for those keys to the validation domains. Fear not, this isn't exclusive to bind, ACME tools supports dozens of other backends. That's all you need the actual domain doesn't need to be resolvable with an A/CNAME record. Internally you can run an entirely different DNS server to resolve your hosts, use hosts files, or use bind zones.

[–] BonkTheAnnoyed@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Okay. Yup, that's probably true. I'm not that deep into network stuff. But, if you're just doing the basic, 'ha.mydomain.com => 121.41.38.9' that works out of the box with name based virtual hosts and reverse proxy, then yeah, you'll get traffic on that within 24 hours.

I reckon if a person understands what you're talking about though, they're already doing better than most.