this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
993 points (99.3% liked)

politics

27071 readers
2494 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shortly after a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer shot and killed a woman in Minneapolis on Wednesday, city leaders began looking into whether the officer had violated state criminal law.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said, “We collectively are going to do everything possible to get to the bottom of this, to get justice, and to make sure that there is an investigation that is conducted in full.” Police Chief Brian O’Hara followed up by saying that the state’s Bureau of Criminal Apprehension is “investigat[ing] whether any state laws within the state of Minnesota have been violated.”

If they conclude that state law has been violated, the question is: What next? Contrary to recent assertions from some federal officials, states can prosecute federal officers for violating state criminal laws, and there is precedent for that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Contextual_Idiot@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You're wrong about about what's causing the apathy and disinterest. It's not being caused by phones and tablets, social media addiction, or doomscrolling. Those are symptoms of the real problem.

That 22 year old cashier is zoning out because that's their 2nd or 3rd job, and they're exhausted. Those folks who refuse to watch the video? Some of them simply can't, because they're burnt out from just trying to survive. Those cynical kids with no hope for the future? After 2 recessions and a pandemic, that's kept them out of the jobs market, I can't blame them.

A lot of people are struggling to survive. Struggling to ensure they can keep a roof over their head, struggling to afford groceries, struggling to afford that car they need to get to the 2 or 3 jobs they work.

The cost of living is ridiculous now, and wages are stagnant. A large amount of people are simply surviving. All their energy is going to getting their basic needs met, and not all are able to meet those needs. They can't spare the attention to care about the rest of the world, when they are worrying about which bill to pay and which can wait. Or how to keep that car running just a bit longer until they can get it fixed.

Trump and his goons are absolutely taking advantage of this too. Don't fight back, or we'll make things worse. Argue with us and we'll take away that benefit you're using to survive. So you're absolutely right when you say something has to be done. And the sooner, the better. But understand that for those folks we are talking about, they won't be able to help. Not yet. Unfortunately, things will have to get worse before they are forced to act. And not "ICE is killing more people" worse. It'll be "I'm getting evicted, I can barely afford to eat, and a lot of people I know are the same."

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I will agree that the system is now a cycle, that it's now self-sustaining apathy that breeds exploitation that breeds apathy, etc. It's a downward spiral, but I will not budge that our dead internet of mindless dopamine hits isn't a strong link in that chain of despair or a major factor in people's lack of willingness to organize to actually address those problems that are making people want to escape reality. To say nothing of what it's done to our atomized perspectives and inability to agree on a shared world anymore.

But that aside, the crux of what I'm talking about is community. In other times, we were much better as a species and society at creating community that reinforces both the laws of the land and provides us with opportunities to either change the system or to reinforce it and help each other. Whether or not you think that doomscrolling is responsible or not for the conditions we're in, it's absolutely keeping us divided and isolated and alone. We are a species wired to have face-to-face socialization and it's on the decline. Rates of young relationships are dropping like a rock, birth rates are dropping, people don't go out and hang out and enjoy being around each other anymore because we all have a billion voices of strangers stomping around in our heads making us fear and hate each other and ourselves. Social pressure is what drives people to want to make better choices, it's what drives people to want to not look stupid so they will be pushed to learn about issues and ideas. Social pressure is a stronger guiding hand for morality and ethics than any legal or religious system. Instead of nurturing community we all have discord servers with other self-diagnosed people unwilling to answer the phone or even say hi to a stranger.

This might not be the only problem we have, but it's a huge one and we're broadly not addressing it or caring how much harm it's doing, and people, particularly in places like this, will feel so triggered by the mere suggestion that their online habits are depriving them of a better world and more opportunities that they'll rage and drop essays about how much being online all the time has helped them, and then 5 minutes later make another post in another forum talking about how lonely and depressed they are. Make it make sense.

I agree with you about the harms social media causes. It's not helping matters at all, and actively harms people. But so does alcohol. Drinking can relax people, make them feel numb and happy for a short while. Doesn't help them at all. But we don't point the finger at alcohol, we say it's a symptom of a larger problem. In this case I'm saying social media consumption is the same, just a symptom of a larger problem.

And like alcohol, it doesn't actually help at all. It just takes a person's mind off their problems for a while. It lets them unplug and just mindlessly scroll Tiktok or Instagram. Say stupid shit on Twitter.

Building community is an answer to this problem. Arguing on the internet is like yelling at the void, where speaking in person tends to make someone think more and be more mindful of what they say, since the repercussions are immediate and right on front of you. And it's just better for the person too, getting to feel that connection to other people.

The problem though, is that it takes a lot more effort, time, and money to participate in community. The people I'm talking about, simply can't. They don't have that time, energy, or money. They can't afford to meet friends for dinner, even at each other's homes. They can't go meet friends at a nearby park because they're exhausted from work. They can't go hang out at a friend's place because of the time commitment. The couple of hours they might have at the end of the day is spent browsing simply because it's low energy and doesn't cost them anything more. It's the only thing that lets them unwind, or unplug, or blow off some steam.

I think the answer is to have the community meet these people where they are. That's a huge undertaking though, which is probably why we haven't seen very much of it yet. But it's going to be sorely needed.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago

Good comment. You see a lot of why dont all Americans just strike? type comments from people living in countries with workers protections.