this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
251 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

79580 readers
6219 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 34 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Kinda a crazy move considering that they were charging 8k for "fsd" before, and are moving to a monthly subscription of a hundred bucks a month.

You would have to own your Tesla for six and a half years for them to make the same return. My guess is that the hundred dollars a month is just the initial price which will drastically inflate over time. That or they are just going to raise prices by 8k and still charge you a subscription cost anyways....

[–] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or you get more people buying in. 8k up front looks a lot different than a couple hundred a month.

[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd rather just pay it once and have it.

Like video games. Just let me pay money for the whole game.

[–] trougnouf@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Rational people don't buy Teslas.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

the problem is it's non-transferrable, so if you want to sell the car (or totaled it) before ~6 years you would lose money compared to paying $100/month.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago

Oh that's just another nail in the coffin of me EVER buying a Tesla

If it was transferable like idk, any other option you get on your car, the 8k price tag could at least be offset by like 20-50% by the car having better value when selling it on. This way it's just... Wtf. Imagine paying 8k and then selling the car after a year and the next person has to pay 8k too.

100 bucks a month starting to seem reasonable in comparison indeed

[–] XLE@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What? Purchasing a premium package for your car vanishes when it transfers to a new owner?

If you buy a premium trim, it doesn't vanish if you resell the car.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

the hardware is there regardless of trim. you are paying for the right to use the hardware already in the car you purchased.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wouldn't the car sell for more because of the extra features?

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

The feature is tied to the account, not the car 💡

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At one point they were charging $15k for it, and Elmo was claiming it would go to $100k in its final form. You know, when it actually fucking worked. Which it never will.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They seem to be dropping the price until they find a price point where a decent percentage of their users will actually pay for the service.

If the system was genuinely self driving, as in the vehicle could run unattended, it would be worth having.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

I bought it for my Tesla (back when I had it) for $2500. Shitty decision, but I believed the hype. Can’t wait to get my $5 check from the class action suit.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

Except for they don't have the hardware to do that reliably since musk goes for cheapest parts possible and removes redundancy

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah, I suspect nobody was buying the feature. They may increase the price if they get it to truly work, but I suspect a hundred odd a month is what most people are willing to pay.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, I suspect this is a chas flow thing. Their sales are dropping. The feature is there, sonit costs nothing to give it. See if they can milk a few dollars. Even if it makes less money on the long term, it might stop the share price crashing in the medium or short term.