699
this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
699 points (98.6% liked)
Leopards Ate My Face
8650 readers
1026 users here now
Rules:
- The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
- Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
- If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
- Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
- For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
- Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
- This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
- All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.
Also feel free to check out:
Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Those who want to hurt others who are just trying to live their lives peacefully deserve to be hurt themselves. May she get roughed up and deported by ICE.
Byeeeeeeeeee sounds like maybe there is no LGBTQ agenda where sharif came from
That's the thing. Find me one nation that is anti-LGBTQ+ and doesn't have other oppressive policies. Maybe rethink your fucking stance if it's only supported by dictators, theocrats, and fascists.
...
...
Yes, I stripped out some very important words, but those words don't actually change the underlying problem: we are each wishing harm befall other people.
She wants people hurt; we want people hurt. We're all getting exactly what we say we want.
By all means, marvel at her stupidity and bigotry, but please stop short of becoming her.
Oh oh, lets find common ground evwee bwaaddy! Peace and love! Turn the other cheek! Fuck off if you think that works. We have been pursuing that for decades. Reconciliation requires a sincere seeking of truth. It’s not in them, and will never will be for most.
“Becoming her,” would be attacking her because of where she was born, or skin color, or religion, or sexuality. We should attack her intolerance.
I don’t care if they are now naturalized citizens. They lied on any oath of loyalty to our constitution. They deserve the ICE treatment. They are a part of the world’s population that will succumb to strong men. They are those whom have enabled and carried out genocides throughout history. I have been them. I was raised like them. I know them.
If 1/3 of the world’s population cannot abide by social contracts of tolerance, then they should destroyed.
We are not becoming like them. We have to hit the bully in the face. The difference is that many of us will be completely traumatized by what we had to do to stop the bullying. We will weep and use our emotional pain to design better institutions and futures. Will they? Fuck no they won’t.
Parent comment wasn't attacking her intolerance. Parent comment was wishing her harm.
Furthermore: "Religion" should not be a protected class.
As are you: You are wishing harm on her, not on her intolerance. This is the exact distinction I was trying to highlight.
I want her to wake up. I have heard too many accounts like hers. Those accounts are depressing, because nearly 100% of them expressed that they would still support the politicians that harmed them.
As far as religion, I’d prefer if it didn’t exist, but I will tolerate people’s delusions if they don’t cause intolerance and harm to others. It is not inherent like skin color, but it is does create classes that get targeted by intolerant classes.
At some point, we must harm the intolerant by depriving them of liberty, or life. We have been entreating and begging for them to not be this way. Our “want” to hurt them is the culmination of our frustration and understanding of what their intolerance leads to. There is no fucking paradox here. That fury that we are feeling is the natural impulse to survive or die.
She wishes harm on people just living their lives. I wish harm on those that wish harm on others. We are not the same.
Punch Nazis.
I will allow you only those tools you give to the Nazis currently in charge. What are you going to let them use against us?
Look, a year ago, I'd agree with the point you're trying to make. Unfortunately, the time for playing nicely to avoid escalation has passed.
"Oh no, they're disappearing people without due process. We better silently protest or else maybe they'll start doing even worse things!" is not the move
I don't think you understand my point: what part of your argument justifies ICE bringing harm to this woman? Do you support ICE actions? Do you support something these Nazis want to do?
Oh the downvotes you'll get from not wishing ill on others.
Sure, the person above you only wanted them to get a dose of misfortune, but it still seems relevant to me.
The opposite of stupidity isn't just the opposite stupidity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
Thomas Paine understood the problem.
Karl Popper's philosophy calls for directly and actively suppressing the people you and I deem "intolerant". The fundamental problem with his philosophy is that the Nazis are already in charge. Any method you use to suppress "the intolerant", you give to the Nazis. It goes straight into their hands for them to use against the people they deem "intolerant". Popper asks you to forge the tools of your own demise.
Thomas Paine's philosophy breaks the cycle. He opposes fascism in general. When you instill Thomas Paine's values in the general populace, you discredit yourself in their eyes as soon as you call for suppressing anyone.
Fascism that you happen to agree with is still fascism. Popper's actual paradox is that he was a fascist.
Thank you, I will read more about this.
“Fascism that you happen to agree with is still fascism.” Do you truly believe that those calling for oppression against fascists, become fascist? We must be using different definitions of fascism, unless you’re saying that us making them the out-group is the same. That doesn’t ring true to me. Are there examples of this from history?
Whatever tool of oppression you are going to use is the exact same tool that will be used against you.
Paine's message is "destroy those tools so nobody can use them".
Popper's message is "use these tools until you face no oppression".
Popper was a fascist.
Oppression is not fascism