NikkiDimes

Is it perfect? No. But I understand everything you said! Personally, I'd rather you do your best and make mistakes than read stiff AI generated text. That and your English is a hell of a lot better than my German :). If any English speakers call you out on your writing, at least you're actually multilingual, while they probably only speak English.

I've actually been learning Japanese for a couple of years now and what I like to do is write out what I want to say first, run it through an AI to correct it, then see why and how I messed it up to try to improve. Maybe that also just makes me sound like a robot though 😂

You should use it to help you, but don't just copy paste the outputs, you'll never learn for yourself that way 😭

That's a very naive simplification of the AI training process. You start with that, then pay people pennies in a developing nation to produce hand crafted training data, resulting it using stupid words like delve and whimsical entirely too much.

Merely training on internet content with no RLFH training results in probable gibberish like that of GPT-2

Well if that ain't the most AI response of all time

Found the original, it is indeed not only AI generated, but also watermarked with Grok https://x.com/i/status/1918707088487821482

Between just my uncommon device, my languages spoken, and rough location (timezone), I'm actually crazy identifiable, yikes.

People use NaN on purpose? 😨😨😨

And there should be no enthusiasm. Any means to disenfranchise large swaths of people can be turned around and used on yourself.

Whaaat Javascript is famously known for being extremely weird with NaN values lol

"normal" is relative.

In other words, no.

Oh, wow, I had no idea. I don't use zest too often, but I'll have to keep that in mind next time! I could probably end up making something that I think tastes amazing while being completely off-putting to others if I'm not careful 😅

??? 15-55 million people starved in the famine. You're the one that said Chinese specifically, despite that being the total human death toll estimate.

You were comparing the total of one to a subset of another, that's the only reason I commented on it. What exactly are you trying to say with this comment?