this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
118 points (92.1% liked)

Linux

11254 readers
824 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] misk@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What standards would Microsoft EEE in this case? POSIX?

[–] brian@programming.dev 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

they might ship a proprietary lib with their os, encourage developers to use it, then license it out of being distributed

[–] misk@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I imagine it’d be more like Android/iOS. Lock down bootloader so you can’t tamper with the OS, enforce notarisation requirement so that apps have to go through them. But Microsoft can’t do that, they don’t have any users vendor-locked to their application store. Valve on the other hand is in a much better position to do this.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] misk@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s not what EEE is.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

By all means do nitpick the specific meaning of EEE, might be amusing to others.

[–] misk@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I just don’t like people throwing around terms they don’t understand, leads to weird outcomes like people saying Meta would EEE ActivityPub back when every instance decided to defederate Threads.