Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

143 readers

1 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@soccer.forum

rglullis

[Dale Johnson] Panel says Newcastle goal vs. Arsenal correct (www.espn.com)

submitted 1 year ago by SamuraiiChampluu@alien.top to c/main@soccer.forum

323 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Littlegreenman42@alien.top 2 points 1 year ago (43 children)

Somehow the Kai Havertz is a unanimous sending off by the panel, but the Bruno Guimares elbow/forearm to the back of the head is not deemed a red card by 2 people. Make it make sense

[–] forestation@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No. The article suggests everyone on the panel personally thought that the elbow was a red card offense. But only 3 out of 5 thought it was a clear and obvious error to not give a red. Meaning that 2 out of 5 believed there was a gray area where some refs could plausibly judge the offense to only be a yellow.

[–] CharlieBrownBoy@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I don't get how you can reconcile that.

This isn't a grey area red card. And the ref didn't give it a red card.

If that's not the definition of clear and obvious, then what is?

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (41 replies)