this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
140 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11177 readers
387 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.ca/c/news/p/484228/ice-is-at-the-border-of-new-brunswick-and-maine-premier-says

New Brunswick Premier Susan Holt on Wednesday criticized the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown in the U.S. that has now spread to neighbouring Maine, saying it’s making people in her province “very, very uncomfortable” to have them at the border.

Holt told reporters in Ottawa that the presence of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at the New Brunswick-Maine border was affecting people with cross-border family and business ties that have already been struggling under strained relations due to U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs and attacks on Canada.

“We see what’s happening in the country,” she told reporters. “We see it in New Brunswick right now with ICE agents on the border of New Brunswick and Maine, in Calais. And it makes us all very, very uncomfortable.

“There’s nothing that we recognize in our neighbours right now, with the leadership that they have. We’re eager to support them in a return to the long-standing and strong partnership that Canada and the U.S. have had for generations.”

https://archive.is/RF71l

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We don't need a bunch of toothless hillbillies with guns to take matters into their own hands for "National defence". You want to defend the nation part time? Join the reserves. You get to shoot more powerful guns than you're ever allowed at home, and you can ACTUALLY defend Canada.

We also have enough gun rights for everything you need a gun for. You want to hunt or shoot targets? Have at it. All you have to do is prove you can operate a gun safely and you can have as many guns as you want.

You want to shoot a human beings outside of sanctioned war? Thanks for outing yourself as someone who shouldn't have guns.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I am really fucking tired of this argument. Gun control in Canada has was never about public safety but was always about fear of people actually challenging the government. You know why in the recent years passing laws still using Polytechnique as the reason despite more recent (and deadlier) mass shootings? Because it was never about that.

In the 19th century and early 20th century gun laws in Canada were fuelled entirely by anti-Irish and anti-immigrant racism in general. In the 1970s the first real long-gun control was spurred by Quebec independence movements and in the 90s it was neither Polytechnique nor the Concordia shootings that spurred the modern gun license scheme. It was the Oka Crisis that had actual large numbers of armed First Nations forcing the government to negotiate instead of bulldozing over their land.

As for having enough gun rights for everything we need? Have you been living under a rock? Since 2020 the gun bans in Canada have gutted almost all shooting sports. Handguns cannot be obtained anymore, 3-gun is effectively dead, and they've banned thousands upon thousands of models of guns that were formerly non-restricted and uncontroversial, and now they stated they're going after shotguns and they're putting hinting at putting any shotgun with any kind of magazine on a to-ban list. They've also banned so many semi-automatic rifles that there are very, very few models that are legal, and I guarantee you, they will likely be mentioned soon.

They stated that any gun with a detachable magazine is not off the table for a ban. Do you understand that basically every single bolt-action rifle made after WW2 has a detachable magazine? It isn't a war on gun crime. It is a war on shooting sports. Canada now, you might find hard to believe, likely has fewer legal gun models than the UK.

In the UK their licenses are harder to get, but if you get them, there are no magazine limitations, manually operated AR-15 are legal, and there are no illegal semi-auto rimfire rifles or magazine restrictions on them. In Canada they effectively are going to ban almost all semi-auto rifles and they're going after many bolt-action rifles.

On top of that, the laws in Canada have never been proven to be effective. They're also extremely expensive and have never delivered on their promises of gun confiscation despite the massive claim that it has.

Tell you don't understand either guns or gun laws in Canada without telling me you don't know that.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

You weren't talking about gun rights in any of these contexts. You were saying Canadians should have more powerful guns so they could shoot ICE agents (or similar potential invaders) that dare cross the border for "National defence", which is LUNATIC logic.

We already have national defence and it's not going to be improved with a bunch of poorly trained, undisciplined, disorganised half wits roaming the countryside making rogue decisions on who gets to live or die between sips of bud light.

Don't move the goal posts to an easily defensible strawman position so you can copy paste right wing gun activist rhetoric.