Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

143 readers

1 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@soccer.forum

rglullis

Premier League's independent key match incedents panel decisions regarding the Newcastle-Arsenal match (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by OPchainsaw@alien.top to c/main@soccer.forum

95 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheGoldenPineapples@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I just don't really get the consistency here.

I personally have no issue with VAR not being able to rule that the ball went out of play. I think Gabriel was fouled in the build-up and I still don't see how they didn't have the correct footage for the offside, but that's another matter entirely.

My point is that if there wasn't enough evidence to rule out whether or not Willock had run the ball out for them to act, then why was Rashford keeping the ball in play against Brighton not given the same advantage? Surely, they had the same level of evidence for that, no?

[–] NUFC9RW@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

They had a better angle on that one they judged to be sufficient evidence to rule that out.

[–] kdpilarski@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

They had a camera view level with the goal line for the rashford goal, which they didn't for this one.

[–] Jamesy555@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

They didn’t actually, there was a camera level with the line rather than at an off angle