this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
805 points (93.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9604 readers
925 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This video explains really well exactly why transit is better than cars: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=j4s9WDDRE2A

This one too: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=WiI1AcsJlYU

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I also like to point to this graphic:

Cars are just an insanely inefficient way to move people around in cities.

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 10 points 1 year ago

I would like to provide this XKCD in case the last graphic was too helpful.

[–] HaywardT@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I take issue with this graphic. It is disingenuous to imply that foot traffic isn't the highest density form of transit. You can't load a train with other trains. People have to walk.

[–] hemko@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You forgot to account speed. Trains go something between 20-40+ times (or far more if you account carriage) faster than average person walking. This increases the throughput of the lane massively.

[–] __dev@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Odd take. You don't load trains from the front, you load them from the side. A suburban rail lets you turn ~5 3.5m wide "lanes" of pedestrian traffic into a single equivalent lane of rail.

[–] matt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't things like trains and buses be more dense because you can design them to have multiple floors?

This is, of course, not true for all of them but it's definitely the case in many places.