453
‘Buried at the Trump Golf Course’: Explosive FBI interview unearthed in Epstein files
(www.rawstory.com)
this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
453 points (98.9% liked)
politics
28307 readers
2169 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm sure it's unpopular, but how many others think that just like with an other high publicity case, there are plenty of nuts who phone in crazy shit to the FBI about Epstein and Trump? Just because they are both bad guys and committed all sorts of crimes including rape of minors doesn't mean the kooks don't call in for them too.
This is an absolute bullshit take. We have a huge pile of evidence that Trump and Epstein raped tortured and killed kids. We also know that of the evidence that's hidden, it's hidden BECAUSE it includes the details of torture and killings. Your default position for a testimony that Trump was involved in rape, torture, or killing of kids shouldn't it be to suspect the witness is lying and has ulterior motives, and that Trump is innocent. There is no reason to doubt the witness, they're describing witnessing exactly what we already know to be true!
I'd actually be surprised to learn that Trump killed kids. I'm not saying he's not capable. He just seems too oblivious to other people's suffering that he would think it necessary. Look at all the women he raped and molested, and he and seemed to think they enjoyed it.
Edit: Made the subject of the last phrase more clear.
Who's going to name Robin Leech of all people, unless it were real?
Someone who for some reason associates Robin Leech with the rich and famous.
Huh. Well you may be onto something.
Sure, maybe. But they didn't just phone stuff in - they were interviewed.
So, they interviewed this person, but not the guy who claimed he drove Trump -- as well as a victim -- and overheard pedo rape conversations, and described a murder which was consistent with death records?
And in both cases, they don't investigate?
I don't see the "phony fake calls" excuse holding up at all.
source
let the evidence be examined publicly
It’s a Raw Story article. This is the far left’s version of Fox News.
Lel who is the far left again? I have trouble imagining that these days
Anyone who is against pedophiles.