this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
504 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

81653 readers
5428 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
504
California’s New Bill Requires DOJ-Approved 3D Printers That Report on Themselves (blog.adafruit.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
236 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

California’s new bill requires DOJ-approved 3D printers that report on themselves targeting general-purpose machines.

Assembly Member Bauer-Kahan introduced AB-2047, the “California Firearm Printing Prevention Act,” on February 17th. The bill would ban the sale or transfer of any 3D printer in California unless it appears on a state-maintained roster of approved makes and models… certified by the Department of Justice as equipped with “firearm blocking technology.” Manufacturers would need to submit attestations for every make and model. The DOJ would publish a list. If your printer isn’t on the list by March 1, 2029, it can’t be sold. In addition, knowingly disabling or circumventing the blocking software is a misdemeanor.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there it is. yes, and you guys have a constitutional right to bear arms, with an infinity of them already in circulation.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That didn't work well for that doctor that was murdered by ICE.

[–] oyenyaaow@lemmy.zip 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

hardware store parts didn't work out so well for Shinzo Abe too.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Not personally. But Sanae Takaichi was Abe's ideological successor. Now she's right back in the PM with an enormous majority.

You can doohickey the man, but you can't doohickey the movement.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Very frustrating to see people confuse Gun Ownership with Being Bulletproof.

As though you're going to quick draw on the entire LASD, at which point they'll all just tip their hats and proclaim "this person has constitutional rights, we will leave peacefully and not bother you again".

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

But he didn't draw on them, it was in it's holster, they removed it from his holster, then murdered him

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

But he didn’t draw on them

Because he was rushing to help one of his neighbors recover from tear gas. Which is what an EMT is trained to do.

they removed it from his holster, then murdered him

As they were trained to do

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

that's because usians have the illusion they live in a democracy and that weapons are a right instead of a duty.

the fact they can have a weapon doesn't mean the regime will take lightly to dissidents, just that they can in fact have them for now. fascists certainly have them, that's for sure.

and historical figures or whatever said this was gonna happen and shit.