this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
NBA - Main
14 readers
3 users here now
Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What I don't get about the Draymond tech is that Mitchell's foul was clearly flagrant, regardless of what happened before. So you can call the tech on Draymond but it should have been a flagrant on Mitchell regardless. There's no rule that you make subsequent fouls a lower grade if there was a tech before that. EDIT: I am not a Warriors fan. I'm just making an observation about the ruling.