I've seen her videos before and they're fantastic. I hadn't seen this one yet obviously. What I took away from this is for right now CO2 is the immediate threat but waste heat will be a problem at some point. If a doctor had a patient with cancer and a bullet wound. He or she will treat the bullet wound before ordering a round of chemo. If I can get all star treky, it sounds like some kind of perfect Maxwell's demon might be the holy Grail in converting waste heat into free energy. Regardless though the immediate concern should be reducing CO2.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just be careful. She's known as a bit of a crank. Physics is happy to accept curmudgeons, but remember that there are more professional, experienced opinions than her's alone.

For ex, you'll see she has a video on trans people with some... specious conclusions.

[–] jasory@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've personally seen little evidence of her being a crank. I've seen many claims and they mostly tie to her running a sort of consultation company, but no evidence of her or her firm promoting objectionable ideas. Sure she might oversimplify some topics, particularly economics and sociology. But I think her main critique in the trans video holds up... a lot of the research is poor quality and while not directly the fault of the researchers (although many of them do promote it) it is used to support hypotheses that were never tested.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I understand. Just keep an open mind, even negative people are usually trying to contribute in a positive way the only way they know how.