this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
537 points (91.1% liked)

Memes

54813 readers
1908 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zeezee@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

bro wat - I'm yet to see a socialist party group turn up to an anti-fash protest and put themselves in harms way to protect vulnerable groups instead of standing on the side lines selling political newspapers and dipping out as soon as their leaders decide they'd like to go home

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There are plenty of Socialist revolutions but they happen outside of the first world. Coincidentally anticolonial movements are often opposed by Anarchist because the victims aren't perfect enough.

on the side lines selling political newspapers

Anarchist 'zines are literally a meme term

[–] zeezee@slrpnk.net 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

yeah that's fair - but I feel they serve different purposes?

like I see anarchism as a form of counterbalance to state power irrespective of where it is - without needing to be dogmatic

as in undeniably Uruguay is materially much better now than its ever been (while still being at the peak of it's colonial project even under socialist governance)

same with Bolivia giving relative power to indigenous peoples while improving living conditions even under a corrupt government

neither is perfect but vastly better than western powers seizing their resources and wage enslaving their populations - same goes for other socialist Global South countries

and yet I see the value of anarchist "purity" criticism in that it should continue to challenge all governments when the time is right - even socialist ones - as at the end of the day we all want a stateless society - and until then I dont see why anarchism and socialism can't strive to achieve that through productive structural tension?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Anarchists are a lot better than Liberals. But when push comes to shove, such as Iran getting invaded, many Anarchists are all too happy to hop on the imperialist fence and hold both-sides stories like it's a moral high-ground

and yet I see the value of anarchist “purity” criticism

That sounds fun and all but who is going to fight imperialism then? Are colonized countries going to free themselves because Anarchists blocked a weapons shipment but then the Anarchist opposes the resistance force fighting against the colonists? Fidel Castro sent fighters to support the imperfect ANC. Now that was some actual solidarity. Though we don't see much of that from "socialist" countries anymore either.

[–] zeezee@slrpnk.net 4 points 20 hours ago

idk what anarchists you're around but all the ones I hang out with are vocally pro Iran even if they dont approve of the Ayatollah on principle - but yh I'd take mls over liberals any day of the week - I feel part of it is that anarchists aren't a solid block so while some may block shipments other might fight against what they see as oppression that on a geopolitical scale can result in helping colonial forces - idk we're all imperfect so I hope we can recognize that and through different means still continue to erode imperialism instead of fighting with each other at the benefit of colonizers