this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
151 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

82461 readers
4302 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That’s my bad for not remembering AMD’s fucking atrocious nonstandard mobile chip naming schemes.

Atrocious compared to Intel? The first CPU with the name Core i7 was released in 2008, but Intel is still releasing a CPU named Core i7 as recently as 2023. They both suck, but in different ways.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Everyone's nomenclature sucks after 2016. Model numbers don't mean anything is what I mean lol

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, we know where the root of this problem came from. Back in the 1990s Intel broke with convention of using ever increasing numeric model numbers

  • 8086
  • 8088
  • 80186
  • 80286
  • 80386
  • 80486
  • Pentium ...wait, what?! Not 80586? Nope.

Intel didn't like that other CPU manufacturers of x86 CPUs (AMD, Cyrix, IBM) could use the same numbering scheme. So Intel created "Pentium" because it could be copyrighted/trademarked so other companies couldn't use it.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

~~There is no 80486. It's called the i486.~~

There is no CPU with a model number of Pentium. Intel's flagship CPUs, in order, were:

  • 4004
  • 8008
  • 8080
  • 8085
  • 8086
  • 80186 (for less than a month; model number A80186)
  • 80286 (model number A80286)
  • 80386 (later renamed to i386; model number A80386)
  • i486 (model number A80486)
  • Pentium (model number A80500, A80501, A80502)

The i386 and i486 had multiple variants with suffixes to the model number (the 486DX and DX2 are often mentioned), and then the Pentium had enough variants that they incremented the model number a couple of times and then changed it completely; Pentium Pro and later CPUs have completely different model numbers.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Such a confident answer! And so incorrect too!

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

That's a model number, not a name. The first Pentium had a model number of A80501, but you wouldn't seriously claim that it's really the 80501, would you?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Read my prior post, I specifically SAID it was a model number.

You're embarrassing yourself with your pedantry. You said 80486 didn't exist. It did. Seriously, quit while you're behind here.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oops, my mistake, you were wrong about the Pentium, then, not the 486. Its model number, as I said, was A80501. You switched from model numbers to names.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago

Oops, my mistake

Apology accepted. Have a great day!