this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
72 points (97.4% liked)
Gaming
4888 readers
138 users here now
The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community
For news, discussions and memes!
Community Rules
This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:
- No NSFW content
You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.
What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:
- Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
- Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
- Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
- Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
- Collaboration: Whether you're here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.
If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There is also Atronachy whereby you are not summoning an atronach, but making your own like a golem.
But I am skeptical about the agency they have being bound to a sunmoner. The basic ritual that all conjuration derives from is also the basis for paralyzation spells.
Also also, the lore has a fascination with some dude who was obsessed with getting himself a cold-flame atronach, though he was never able to. But it was achieved by another hundreds of years later.
Are the atronachs from atronachy and atromancy identical?
If yes, I think consent applies to both. It would be like humans reproducing; a child still has their own agency, even if they were "created" by the parents.
If not... it depends, really. Hypothetically speaking, if you create one through atronachy, and release [it? them?] free, would [it? they?] be able to take autonomous decisions?
Atronachy can create golems from any inanimate material, and it also requires using the soul of a mortal, so it's probably more like slavery.
In a quest in one of the first two games, you are tasked with destroying one such golem that escaped from the mage's guild and was rampaging through the countryside. It was created using the soul of one of the local ruling family members and it seemed to have been taking revenge.
Got it — then they have agency, much like anyone else. So they should be able to consent, and to get that consent violated by the spell.
Thanks for the info!