this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
467 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

82461 readers
4302 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Performing Right Society (PRS) has "commenced legal proceedings" against Steam owner Valve over the use of its members' works on Steam "without permission."

The organization claims that while games right across the spectrum use music to "transform play into emotional, immersive experiences," Valve has "never obtained a licence for its use of the rights managed by PRS on behalf of its members, comprising songwriters, composers, and music publishers."

PRS claims "many game titles which incorporate PRS members' musical works are made available on Steam," including "high profile series" such as Forza Horizon, FIFA/EA FC, and GTA.

PRS said that as it had sought to work with Valve about the licensing issues "for many years without appropriate engagement from Valve," it has now issued legal proceedings under the UK's s20 Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988 and requires any game that uses PRS' works to obtain a licence.

"The litigation will progress unless Valve Corporation engages positively with discussions and takes the necessary license to cover the use of PRS repertoire, both retrospectively and moving forwards," the organization said in a press statement.

Dan Gopal, chief commercial officer, PRS for Music said: "Our members create music that enhances experiences and PRS exists to protect the value of their work with integrity, transparency, and fairness. Legal proceedings are not a step we take lightly, but when a business’s actions undermine those principles, we have a duty to act.

"Great video games rely on great soundtracks, and the songwriters and creators behind them deserve to have their contribution recognised and fairly valued."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

For the benefit of those here suggesting this is a spurious or vexatious lawsuit: in the UK, it's standard for a plaintiff to be forced to pay all the respondent's legal fees if they lose.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 17 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So... this is still a ridiculous case, but they're wealthy enough they aren't too worried even if they lose it? All right.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

My suggestion is that probably their lawyers have examined the case in rather more detail than the armchair lawyers on here pontificating based on an eight-sentence summary. Incidentally, PRS are a 175,000-member artists' rights collective that very often represent a significant portion of individual artists' incomes, they're not some sort of grubby billionaire-owned patent troll.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

I dunno about that given what another person replied with about threatening someone from singing in a store.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/tayside_and_central/8317952.stm