this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
686 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

82581 readers
5385 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube viewers will soon have to sit through even longer ads, with Google rolling out new 30-second unskippable spots on a popular app.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 53 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Those will not block YT ads.

They'll block ads at a DNS level, but YouTube ads are delivered directly into the video stream.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Those will not block YT ads.

This is correct

but YouTube ads are delivered directly into the video stream.

This is false

[–] HyperfocusSurfer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago

Sure, but that can be said about almost anything.

Still, I'd be surprised if they went the route of embedding ads into the stream, in part because of measurability/skipability/etc. It's definitely not out of the question, but I think we're still ways to go before we get there.

And even then, tools like yt-dlp would probably be able to apply some heuristics to figure out which segments are foreign to the stream and slice them out that way. Blocking yt-dlp would require DRM, which in turn requires changing the transcoding pipeline in a pretty non-trivial way. I also doubt they would willingly go this route.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And the reason is that those ad-blockers are based on DNS block lists, and YouTube ads are served by the same servers that also serve videos.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago

This is my understanding as well, yeah.

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Youtubes ads are not delivered into the videostream. That would mean reencodingevery video for every user and would need an insane amount of computing power.

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why would you need to re encode when you can literally pause one stream swap in the ad and then swap back in the paused one in the same response

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago

Exactly. Instead of editing within the video stream you just switch to a second stream.

However from youtubes perspective that has the downside that the switching logic is where adblockers can hook in to block the ads.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That would mean reencodingevery video for every user and would need an insane amount of computing power.

You actually don't have to, on account of how adaptive video streaming works. It's fully possible to serve a few segments of ad content mid-stream.