this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
55 points (83.1% liked)

Science Memes

19458 readers
1945 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

It's frustrating. It's 2026 and we're still pointlessly gendering things. And I don't mean this is a "omg you assumed my gender" way. I mean that organization's that should know better go the extra mile to apply strict genders to things and processes. If this email is about workplace harassment or something like that, it would be easier to just not gender people.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 4 points 7 hours ago

We can't tell if it's pointlessly gendered unless wet know what the questions are about. Seems likely to be a study of some kind, and knowing how men perceive other men, for example, might be valuable data.

[–] _skj@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago

The email sounds like a college student participating in a sociology study for class and asking the professor for clarification. This is exactly the kind of thing that I'd expect to ask about gender along with a bunch of other personal information. The goal being to see if any patterns in the responses.

Sociology in general does have the problem that categories are important and helpful to spotting patterns, but people are very difficult to categorize. People just don't fit cleanly into categories

[–] Ratio_Tile@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Well, sometimes gender fucks with the data because we live in a society and all that. Gotta at least try to compensate for likely sources of error

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

But they’re very correct that so many things aren’t needed. I mean, gender on a driver license? Really?