this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
124 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

15218 readers
670 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/44153801

Denmark’s energy minister called on citizens to reduce their energy use amid the ongoing Middle East conflict.

Oil prices jumped to over $100 a barrel on Thursday, raising fears of rising inflation.

“If it is not strictly necessary to drive the car, then don’t do it,” the minister stressed to Danish citizens.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

Confused. Is Denmark footing the bill for their citizens' oil? Seems like you would just say "hey, oil is expensive now - if you drive for no reason you're a dumbass, but I won't stop you."

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Are you by chance American and a free market fundamentalist or a rugged individualist?

A country asking its citizens publicly to pull together in adressing national risks is a very normal healthy thing to do. It offers obvious direct benefits. That you are confused by this, I find disturbing.

Edit: consider the possibility that your cultural programming may be incorrect in at least some important ways.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 35 points 12 hours ago

Maybe Denmark cares about preventing actual shortages, or about the damage wasteful driving with high gas prices does to the economy as a whole.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Oil costs are going to affect transportation costs all over the board, food, clothes, construction materials... so trying to reduce consumers consumption of oil can help to reduce that impact on the rest of economy. I don't think is going to actually work, but politicians needs to start planting the seed of scapegoats for the future.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Ah. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Then when prices increase or rationing starts, they can point back and say "guys, we told you to use less gas!"

[–] starchylemming@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

the supply is going to be limited if this goes on

agriculture and logistics need fuel more than joe drivearound

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If prices are high only the poor are affected. If you are rich and waste gas you aren't affected. But if you are rich and save gas, it keeps prices lower for those that can't afford it.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 6 hours ago

Most of the poor are on buses, trains or bikes, all of which are pretty good in Denmark. They can't afford to fund cars and their random repair expenses.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

We're like 2 days in and they're already going into their reserves which aren't large enough for supply to be constrained for very long.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Are these, like, strategic reserves for the purposes of national security? I honestly know nothing about how this sort of thing should function, but I feel like if a nation is drawing down their reserves, they should implement a rationing system. Or else set a high price for the use of their reserves so that consumers will search for other options

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

Prices are also going up but its more to prevent economic stalling, which I suppose can be considered national security. High oil prices causes across board inflation. I'm sure the armed forces have a separate reserve.

Rationing is a more extreme measure.