this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
181 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

82830 readers
6488 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
181
PwC will say goodbye to staff who aren't convinced about AI (www.theregister.com)
submitted 17 hours ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

You'll use AI and like it too - if you work for PwC. Paul Griggs, US chief executive of the global professional services giant, has made clear there is no room at the corporation for AI skeptics.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Griggs indicated that anyone who believed they had the "opportunity to opt out" of AI is "not going to be here that long," and warned senior staff not "paranoid about being AI-first" will be replaced by others who are more comfortable with the tech.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 17 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

So, hiring PwC is the same as using AI?

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 35 minutes ago) (1 children)

Not only that, from the article they are actively trying to become a Consultancy As A Service company, where somehow other companies would pay a subscription fee to.... talk to their AI, I guess?

The only time I've had to do with PwC, it was to get their advice on a compliance / tax related process. And it was less about the process itself or the 3 page pdf they produced (which much cheaper companies could have done better) and more because their "seal of approval" would give my company some leverage if the IRS came to audit us. "This was designed with PwC" means "we tried really really hard to do abide by the incredibly confusing wording of the law".

I doubt that "we asked PwC's chatbot" will have the same level of clout, but these guys have connections everywhere so I'm sure they will lobby pretty hard to get some ad-hoc law or some level of "certification" on the output of their future AI.

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 2 points 40 minutes ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago)

Sounds about right, in a wrong sort of way!

Over my side of the plastic swamp, we have so many embroilments with PwC and Dellioit being soooo amazing... selling private information, etc. Also they ae shit at other things and half my job has been fixing the corrupt bastards outputs (unrelated to the fraud stuff - a different fraud)

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 13 points 9 hours ago

Yes, so you should ask for a big discount.