zbyte64

joined 2 years ago
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 9 hours ago

That's all hard to do when billionaires are the ones structuring society. The point is we don't get to choose corrective societal actions unless it is an exercise of individual privilege. I would have loved to take the train to visit relatives, but it literally is not an option.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 9 hours ago

Urban centers have less waste or CO2 per capita than their rural or suburban counterparts. The problem is our pursuit of ever increasing profits is extremely wasteful but is currently how states gain influence.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 13 hours ago

It's barbarism or socialism. Choose wisely.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 14 hours ago

When being a contrarian asshole becomes your marketing strategy.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I am sure they planned and maybe even got the Saudis to consult. But I still think they are too stupid to realize the flaws of those plans. Even if they were as smart as they think they are, it's difficult to predict how things will work after the civilization they depend on for their power collapses. Hell, it probably doesn't matter how smart you are, such a scenario is inherently unpredictable.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Our political system equates value to revenue and that is why we don't tax accordingly. Business owners are labeled "job creators" and taxing them is framed as a negative value add.

Absolutely agree that athletes are also being exploited here and the burden should not fall on them to correct this (except as advocates for a better system).

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's projection. She knows that in her retirement she has stopped "providing value". I doubt she paid you for the ad-hoc legal and accounting work you did for her, so she is happy for you to provide value without compensation. I would simply tell her that if she doesn't want to have to find her own retirement home she needs to start paying for your services. This is the kind of person who thinks value is what you pay for, so long as she isn't paying you she isn't valuing what you do for her. The whole "you are a negative value" is exactly what she is to you, she is taxing your time, energy and emotions to make up for some perceived economic loss for raising a child she chose to have.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 15 hours ago

It took me about 4 tries to find a good therapist. I know it's discouraging but keep your eyes open for a good therapist.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 15 hours ago

"I have money in the bank that measures my value"

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

This. Everyone wants qualified, well paid teachers for their kids, just like how most people want universal healthcare. But our government and media structure actively disempowers any such movements in that direction. Ie "we can agree we all want these things but we can't agree on how"

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

And when the social sector lobbies it is called "special interests" by the press. When capital owners do it they are called "job creators" by the press. Edit: or so it goes in the states.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 7 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Revenue is not the same as value, teachers enable much more economic activity than athletes. The fact we equate "profit generated" to the value of the profession is part of the problem.

view more: next ›