this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
572 points (97.5% liked)

Privacy

9321 readers
415 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
iopq@lemmy.world
572
we dont deserve GrapheneOS (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/privacy@lemmy.world
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116261301913660830

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bonenode@piefed.social 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I do wonder if Motorola will back them on this.

[–] Mnmalst@piefed.social 27 points 1 day ago

I had the same thought. I could imagine a situation where Motorola is afraid about bad PR and them quitting their deal over it. Depending how far this goes.

[–] TheLastOfHisName@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it would behoove Motorola to make their bootloader unlockable (sorry, is that a hardware thing?), and let the consumer have the option to put whatever OS on it they wish.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Firmware. It's up to the OEM to enable it.