this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
831 points (96.9% liked)

Science Memes

19943 readers
3140 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 51 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Not to be "that guy" but I think they are mixing their metaphors here. "Biological weapon" is the comparison they're making, not "biological war" which isn't something I think exists,

So examples like "chemical woman", "woman of mass destruction" work, whereas "total woman" or "guerrilla woman" do not.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 53 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I was thinking "biological warfare". Which still doesn't fit all the references, but I'll write it off as "artistic liberty"

[–] Klear@quokk.au 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

But that would imply scientific liberty, engineering liberty and, worst of all, AI slop liberty.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Warfare of attrition? Warfare of mass distruction? There are, I guess, ways to say those things properly, but these aren't them.

[–] atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

those are said by other people though

[–] protist@retrofed.com 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I assumed it was "warfare," and for that every example works

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Warfare of attrition? Warfare of mass distruction? There are, I guess, ways to say those things properly, but these aren't them.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

I suppose I was talking about the tweet and not the response to the tweet

[–] ThermonuclearHoxha@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

"Biological warfare" does in fact exist, and can be compared to "guerrilla warfare" and perhaps "total war" as a type of warfare as a slight stretch.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, a shit post enjoyer of refined taste I see.

[–] Pipster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago

I dunno, referring to somebody as a "total weapon" is very valid here

[–] silver@das-eck.haus 4 points 3 weeks ago

It's warfare. The only one that doesn't fit is "of mass destruction"

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)