this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
485 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

84143 readers
2602 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He said that the tariff is $1 per barrel of oil, adding that empty tankers can pass freely. "Once the email arrives and Iran completes its assessment, vessels are given a few seconds to pay in Bitcoin, ensuring they can't be traced or confiscated due to sanctions," Hosseini added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

How could that work? Doesn't it take some time for a bitcoin transaction to get pulled into the chain?

[–] commander@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

At the size of transactions they'd be doing, it'd probably be worth it to set a high fee so that it gets picked up and processed faster. Should still be peanuts compared to the value of cargo these tankers are carrying

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It takes 10 minutes to get a single confirmation, but I'm assuming that it takes more than 10 minutes for a ship to transit this waterway, so it wouldn't matter.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 2 weeks ago

I don't imagine trying to trick Iran out of their money is a particularly good long-term strategy anyway. Nothing unless you're going to turn up in a new ship every time.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, but the article says they have seconds to pay with bitcoin.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Something tells me the article doesn't understand the way Bitcoin works. A transaction takes 10 minutes to clear on-chain, unless you're using the lightning network, and the lightning network is fucking terrible, especially for high-value transactions like this. Because you can be rug-pulled. That and you can't send high-value transactions on a lightning network because every link in the chain has to have the proper amount of liquidity to make that transaction occur.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

The ships can wait, I guess.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, and the article says the shippers are given a couple of seconds to pay in bitcoin.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, all the steps leading up to that take way more than a few seconds, including...getting the email. This seems like someone misspeaking or not understanding what's going on...

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Layer 2 networks like the lightning network operated in the milliseconds time frame.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn't that require trust in the provider hosting the off chain transactions? And lightning transactions can get preempted by conflicting moves from a wallet, and invalidated? I'm no expert, but it seems like these big regular transactions would be targets for abuse.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, as far as I understand it. No you create a mutisignature wallet first that holds the funds that can be moved around the layer 2 network.

On chain makes more sense for this application to me too