this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
944 points (99.4% liked)

News

37314 readers
1714 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The new research is the first to measure community water fluoridation exposure during childhood and any potential impact on cognition up to age 80.

The paper is here

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Fluoride does harm brain development, but only if you get way too much of it. This happens in some places where the natural water already contains a lot of fluoride. You absolutely don't want to add even more fluoride there.

But most places, especially in the US, the fluoride level is far below that, so far below that we have to add fluoride to the water to get enough to maintain dental health. But it's still far below the level that causes harm.

[–] Dettweiler42@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The big issue is that the process to make ground water safe to drink removes the Sodium Flouride from it. We have to add it back in, unless you live in a town like mine where they decided to stop flouridating the water because they believe in conspiracy theories and Facebook science.

The levels you need to consume to cause harm are pretty substantial. You would have to be intentionally consuming a LOT of Sodium Flouride to cause issues. It's almost on the level of "how many bananas do you need to eat to get radiation poisoning".

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That is dangerous misinformation. With an LD50 of 0.052 grams per kilogram of body weight, swallowing a teaspoon of sodium fluoride will kill most people (if they aren't induced to vomit or receive emergency medical attention). It's harmless in the dosage put in tap water, but if you have a tub of pure sodium fluoride it is similarly toxic to bleach or moth balls.

Meanwhile you physically can't eat enough bananas to get radiation poisoning. Bananas are less radioactive than human flesh, less radioactive than hotdogs, less radioactive than potatoes. You can swim in liquefied banana and be exposed to less radiation than walking outside on a cloudy day without sunscreen.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You physically can't drink enough (properly) fluoridated water to get fluoride poisoning.

Some back of the napkin math says a typical American (rounded to 200lbs) would need ~67 liters of water to get a lethal does of fluoride. Some lazy googling says that the absolute most your kidneys would handle is 20 liters in a 24hr period before they start failing. Literally, the amount water you can drink is more toxic than the amount of fluoride in it.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

That's not what they said, though. What they said is that "you would have to be intentionally consuming a LOT of sodium fluoride to cause issues". Not fluorinated water, sodium fluoride. The actual salt that kills you if you eat a teaspoon of it.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That’ll be a risk if you have pure sodium fluoride sitting around. Fortunately “no one” does. (Yes, industrial toothpaste manufacturing workers might have an opportunity to be exposed to such a thing).

Typical toothpaste is 1000-1100 ppm of sodium fluoride. “Prescription strength” is about 5000 ppm. So to hit your target LD50 you need to eat around 10 g of toothpaste per kg. Assuming on the extremely small end (40 kg bodyweight): if I did my math right, that’s about 400 g of prescription strength toothpaste, or more than two (170 g) tubes.

Normal toothpaste (1100 ppm) for a normal person (80 kg female average), you need to eat more than 22 tubes of toothpaste to kill half the people involved.

Thats just stupid, there’s zero risk of any of that happening.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Look, I'm not saying the average consumer will ever run into this risk, I'm saying that you shouldn't go around saying H301 acutely toxic chemicals are as safe to ingest as bananas. You're not the president of the United States.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not what they were saying. They were saying the levels in drinking water are so low that it's comparable to radiation levels in bananas.

As in, you'd need to consume so much for it to be lethal that you'd have to be intentionally doing it to cause harm to yourself.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

I believe it is what they meant to say, but it is simply not what they said.

The big issue is that the process to make ground water safe to drink removes the Sodium Flouride from it. We have to add it back in, unless you live in a town like mine where they decided to stop flouridating the water because they believe in conspiracy theories and Facebook science.

The levels you need to consume to cause harm are pretty substantial. You would have to be intentionally consuming a LOT of Sodium Flouride to cause issues. It’s almost on the level of “how many bananas do you need to eat to get radiation poisoning”.

The bolded sentence is unambiguous. It uses no prepositions, no context-dependent phrases, no complex punctuation. It is a simple sentence ending in a full stop. How can you deny this is what they said?

[–] Dettweiler42@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And a teaspoon is 5 ml. Flouridated water is, on average, 0.7 mcg/L. Therefore, you would have to drink over 17,000 liters of water for the flouride to kill you.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's cool, but kind of irrelevant to their remark that sodium fluoride is safe.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is safe. The dose makes the poison.

Shit, even pure oxygen can kill you.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't call a chemical that kills you if you eat a teaspoon of it "safe". It literally has a H301 "acutely toxic chemical" rating.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

sigh

It's safe in the levels added to drinking water.

Absolutely no one is saying pure sodium fluoride is safe.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

You would have to be intentionally consuming a LOT of Sodium Flouride to cause issues.

- The person I first replied to

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why are you getting downvoted for providing relevant facts? Sometimes this place is as reactionary as 8chan

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

Critically judging authorial intent is a 6th grade reading level, and 54% of USAmerican adults have a 5th grade reading level or below. I could have written it more for my audience, the sort of person that needs to hear that pure sodium fluoride is unsafe to ingest.

[–] Zagorath@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

It also begins to have a purely cosmetic but noticeable impact on your teeth long before the detrimental health effects kick in.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Bro, I eat half a tube of toothpaste a day for the health benefits. Have been doing that since I was 8.

Edit: /s for smooth brains

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder why we don't handle it like any other vitamin? Where's my multivitamin tap water?!

I filter my water, so the fluoride goes to waste sadly. Wonder if it comes in a small dose pill.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It does. But I don't know if there's a reason we fluoridate water and not something else, like iodine in salt and all the stuff they put in enriched flour.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Perhaps has to do with the medium and the tendency of things to decay away. Maybe fluoride is stable in water, but something like Vitamin D would break down. Sunlight for example breaks down some things like that. I imagine water is probably a difficult medium to survive in for a lot of things.