this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
565 points (98.1% liked)

Privacy

48109 readers
1543 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Put an indicator light on the glasses with a sensor to make sure it's on from the nose bridge.

This is that part that's missing, it's more obvious when someone is holding their phone to record you. Phone's should probably have an indicator too....

[–] queueBenSis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

this also assumes the entire public is aware of what that little light means, if they can even see it in sunny situations. oh, a light! ok, why didn’t you say so, i by all means now consent to endless public recording from human mounted cameras /s

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Actually I think the public would generally understand this. Older demographics know what a camera indicator is, and for younger ones, a little light on sunglasses would get their attention.

Universally? No. But I'd wager the percentage is high enough for a crowd to know.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In some countries, they've made it illegal to turn off the shutter sound on your camera, so that women can hear the sound when some pervert is trying to take upskirts.

Putting a recording light on the glasses does basically the same thing, by alerting those around them. It wouldn't be hard to disable it, though.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It should play a loud klaxon with the phrase "I am recording surreptitiously" overlayed on it.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

LOL. Yeah, that'll work.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

phones should absolutely indicate and in a way that can't be taped over.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It’s generally more obvious when someone holds up a phone, but yeah.

[–] Zach777@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't it just be illegal to record someone without consent or something? Barring whistelblowing use cases. Putting it on the device manufacturers to stop it is rather dystopian and is like the age verification laws going into affect so they can shut down foss.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

I'm totally down with that. exception of the police and government officials. of course, it'd never happen because it would make commercial surveilance cameras illegal.