Europe
News and information from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)
view the rest of the comments
Well, as a Finn, we already have that.
Every 17 year old male gets a letter telling them to show up at a time and a place, then they get interviewed and asked where you wish to go, a specific military unit, civil service or jail. They also get a health check up.
It gets worse: Iβve heard over in the US, failure to register under the current βSelective Service Systemβ has a fine of $250,000 (~212,000β¬) plus 5 year imprisonment towards male US citizens, which is ridiculous if you ask me.
The US one doesn't issue a letter, rather the information is pulled from existing records via other sources (i.e. drivers license) so that's how they obtained your details on being registered onto a draft pool.
Also, how does society in Finland view the draft and what's the public opinion regarding the Finnish government? I mean, do they think it's worth fighting on behalf of the president's (Stubb) interests?
Last time I checked the support for the mandatory military service was at over 80%, that was a year or so after the escalation of the Ukraine war. It might have come down from that, but pretty sure the vast majority still support it.
No one is going to fight for Stubb's interests. No one is going to fight for Orpo's interests. No one is going to fight to keep the government safe. Everyone is going to fight to defend our country, the land, the people. The way our system is set up is not to use the military to go abroad and slay dragons, as I've heard it put by someone, somewhere.... Our military isn't even called the army or military anymore, its Puolustusvoimat, defense forces. And here it actually means that, unlike in that one country on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean. Our forces do take part in peace keeping operations and such but those are 100% volunteers, you have to actively want to go there, nobody will be forced to do that.
Also, a minor detail, even though the President is the commander-in-chief of the military, that will change if a war breaks out. That also happened in the past, the highest ranking military person will take over the duties of the CIC, President will continue with the civil duties etc.
Unlike the USA, it's akin to "DROP BOMBS EVERYWHERE" (evident from the previous Iraq, Afghanistan wars & the current Iran war). From Bush, Obama, Biden and include Trump in the mix. Plus they have mercenaries accompanying them. The thing is, are both PMC's & Mercs allowed to exist in Finland or are they forbidden?
The military or defense forces by definition is to defend the nation from adversaries (like that of Finland), but the US is abusing the hell out of it just to satisfy defense contractors (as they generate revenue from weapon sales), by orchestrating wars, does it even make sense to try and convince politicians to start wars just to sell arms?
Yeah the major difference is that the US forces fight to keep a global hegemony and the military industrial complex running.
The fight we have always been preparing for is to defend against a attack from russia. There was a funny thing that happened, a Finnish military person was being interviewed by a foreign media, the guy was explaining about our defenses on the east of the country. Then the reporter asked "what if the enemy comes from the west?" and the military guy replied "well, then the enemy has made a large flanking maneuver."
America has been protected by two massive oceans, a friendly neighbor in the north and a weak neighbor in the south. For an American to go "defend" his country means to invade another country thousands and thousands of kilometers away.
Finland has been cursed with a 1300km long border with a maniac. For a Finn to go defend his country means that he is going to be in a trench that goes through a farm that was owned by his fellow citizen. Thats a completely different perspective and attitude.
Most of the time it's under the guise of "enforcing democracy" which is BS! More on resource extraction, like how the Gulf War during the 90s was initiated because Kuwait was invaded by Iraq (which Bush has monopoly on since US oil tycoons are based there) which also involved Saudi Arabia or Qatar as belligerents.
I mean the first Gulf War was initiated because Saddam attacked Kuwait lol. Out of all the wars the US has been involved since 1945, that was the least worst. Saddam needed to be kicked in the teeth and they should have finished the job back then, not leave it up to Junior to fuck up in the 2000s.
Eugh, I feel disgusted for having to mildly defend a US military action. Why'd you make me do this?!
Vietnam on the other hand, the US military used Agent Orange (lehtikuivausaine) against their enemy but left nasty consequences after the war: pregnant mothers giving birth to kids born with defects for instance. The US military is nothing but a political tool to bully whom they consider their adversary. During both the Iraq & Afghanistan wars, was Finland neutral (not involved) or were Finnish troops deployed there?
Dont get me wrong, I have no good things to say about the US military actions and deployments. Vietnam was a atrocity, borderline genocide, a environmental crime of stupendous proportions.
Some Finnish troops were deployed in Afghanistan but didnt do much. Finland has been quite involved in peacekeeping missions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_Defence_Forces#Peacekeeping_operations
Wonder why NO ONE wants to enlist in the US military? Because of the crap they were involved in, it's stupid that the SSS exists for the last century and now Trump bringing it back to light by making the process automatic against one's will, seriously WTF?!
If he's really serious about bringing back a draft, the NDAA(Puolustusvaltuutuslaki) which was passed in 1980 will have to be amended first, given the nature of public opinion being in opposition of it being reinstated, it may not fly.
From what I've heard and seen the main motivations for Americans to join the military is the pay and getting a education (scholarship? Idk the details). Now the pay is not that good, the education doesn't matter because things are going down the toilet anyway... And you still have to go bomb girl schools and stuff. I completely understand the reluctance to join up, forcing people to do so is not going to help either.
American war movies are ridiculous when it comes to the propagandistic messaging behind it, since most always portray them as the protagonist (Top Gun, Hurt Locker, etc). as in order for the director to get access on military hardware: the Pentagon has control on how the script (narrative) is written in exchange on letting the crew use and lend real military equipment with technical advisors on set.
It's known as the Military Entertainment Complex (Sotilasviihdekeskus) which is the cooperation between studios and the armed forces (via the government). It's why Tom Cruise manages to pilot a real fighter jet, for the director to have that on set: he'll have to literally ask the US Navy. What about war movies made by Finns & set in Finland, how does the director or studio obtain military hardware?
No need to translate :) I'm fluent in English :D
I have no idea. I'd assume they ask the museums since most of the Finnish war movies are WW2, Civil War or older.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Unknown_Soldier_(1955_film)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talvisota_(film)
If you are at all interested in that sort of stuff, I can highly recommend The Unknown Soldier (specifically the 1955 one, not the modern adaptions). Also the book is excellent.
Stubb will never have interests that involve fighting unless the country wants it.
I mean... Thats how it should be. The representatives should do what the people want. Not randomly attack Iran for weird reasons.
Doesn't check out. If everybody is so eager to defend "the country, the land, the people" why is there a mandatory draft and a jail fine for not participating?
-.-
*everyone who is willing to fight for their country will fight for the people, not the politicians.
Is that better?
When I turned 18 in the US, they sent a postcard with return postage paid that had 2 checkboxes. First check box was that you were signing up for the draft and the 2nd was that you wished to register to vote.
Check, check, back in the mailbox. Done.
I've always just assumed this wasnt automatic so they could confirm address and that you're still alive.