this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
55 points (98.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

41710 readers
1757 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I haven't watched YouTube on a desktop in years so maybe you still can....

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bademantel@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I love the illusion and enjoy immersing myself in it, but let's not kid ourselves. It has always been about profit.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but there was also a time where companies tried to make that profit by providing good products and enjoyable experiences customers wanted, rather than simply being a monopoly where users can choose between an obscene amount of ads or yet another subscription

[–] Bademantel@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

That's an interesting point. Perhaps there was a time when quality was the defining metric and customer enjoyment was considered. In hindsight, this was short-lived, as other metrics became more important in order to satisfy stakeholders. My point is that this is always bound to happen in a capitalist system.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

May feel fun to say or something but that's inaccurate. It took YouTube 5 years to break even.

[–] Bademantel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's standard procedure for a start-up. You rely on investment money and focus on growth rather than profitability.

I don't understand the nostalgia for a YouTube that was supposedly only created for our enjoyment. It never existed. It was always going to squeeze as much money out of its users as possible to satisfy its shareholders.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Again inaccurate.

Business loans (especially tech sector circa the .com bust) most typically expect solvency within 3 years.

It was a big deal that YouTube wasn't profitable nearly 5 years in. They were expected to lose nearly half a billion their 5th year.

[–] Bademantel@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? I'm kinda speechless. In tech it's absolutely normal to not be profitable after 3 years. Amazon, Uber, Tesla, Netflix. Just off the top of my head. You can find many more. And we don't even need to talk about AI. Have you seen their profits?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only company you mentioned that even existed during the .com bubble is Amazon.

Not a single company you listed isnt VC, more importantly. Not someone taking out a business loan.

[–] Bademantel@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My dude, you're lost in the sauce. You edited your comment to mention the dot-com bubble after I posted but why would we even talk about that? YouTube wasn't founded until several years later.

Why wouldn't I talk about VC? YouTube was backed by VC a couple of months after its creation.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not going to engage with someone who cannot bother to read what they're responding to. You have a reading comprehension problem here.

Peace out girl scout. ✌️

[–] Bademantel@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That’s a pretty textbook ad hominem, so I don’t think there’s much to continue here.

Have a good one, either way.

Edit: Saw that you used an alt account to downvote me twice. That's actually kind of pitiful. You won this argument, okay champ?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I'm blocking you now. Bye 👋

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'm not sure it was about profit when it was an independent website that had no ads. You know, before Google bought it. How was it even making money back then?

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

YouTube began as an angel-funded enterprise working from a makeshift office in a garage. In November 2005, venture firm Sequoia Capital invested an initial $3.5 million,[20] and Roelof Botha (a partner of the firm and former CFO of PayPal) joined the YouTube board of directors. In April 2006, Sequoia and Artis Capital Management invested an additional $8 million in the company, which had experienced significant growth in its first few months.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_YouTube

[–] Hexagon@feddit.it 1 points 2 days ago

That's the neat part, it wasn't