Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.
-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
Happened to me when I saw a book on the US site, I wasn't able to see all reviews, but there was a button to sort-of "apply" to get approved for seeing all of them.
It took five days, then I got this email.
Interestingly, they're not doing this on the European site, you can still see all reviews there.
If you want to try it out yourself: This is the book where it happened. Despite that email I can see all of the reviews again, so maybe it's a feature they're testing out.
It's really shady to have a rating system and hide ratings within that system. Why have it at all then?
Looks like Amazon.ca still lets you see all reviews thankfully
Remember Amazon is owned by a billionaire or someone who is a part of the sociopathic class. They only want you to buy they don't give a shit about what you care about just pressing that buy now button. The laws are supposed to force them to care about the shit we care about but, everyone on this planet in politics is a corporate shill so tough luck.
If you're talking about Bezos, he only owns 9% (or possibly even less now) of Amazon.
Huh til, it still is the source of his wealth, and the other 91% probably also goes mostly to rich assholes, however I'm sure the public will be holding the bag if Amazon ever goes down in valuation.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/insights/052816/top-4-amazon-shareholders-amzn.asp
It sounds like they were taking about whoever owns Amazon.
Oodles of shareholders? I doubt it.
Maybe it's lazy on my end, but my first guess is that it would be in order to prioritize and normalize the AI summary. Basically a dystopic move towards trust me bro
"To improve the user experience we are hiding things that were one of the primary reasons we became a monopoly."
To manipulate the market, is the only answer I can come up with. Why else would they do this?
Making their massive collection of reviews only available to their shitty AI, I would suppose.
I tried from canada on amazon US same as you i have to “apply” to get more review a fast search show they do that since at least since middle of 2025 on “ products in categories with high competitive pressure and potentially manipulable reviews “
Still don’t make much senses
So that's actually interesting though. I'm not necessarily condoning this behavior. But if they have identified that unscrupulous, fraudulent outside parties are potentially manipulating the reviews, and that is what's causing Amazon to block the reviews, then that might actually be a beneficial move on their part. It's Amazon, so I'm inclined to think they are the ones behaving badly, but this is at least a possibility.
I'd wager it's to prevent other AI trainer bots from scraping the reviews
For what it's worth, I'm in the US Amazon app on Android and it states "96 customer reviews".
Once I unchecked the box requiring verified purchases, it does in fact show 96 reviews.
Where did you see that system? Because I went to the page and didn't see anything like that.
there's no apply button and it seems all reviews are there
Since it's a content rating review system, I almost wonder if Amazon has internally marked your account as a minor or something like that, so they're hiding explicit reviews or something.
I just checked and it looked normal on my end as well.
I don't see it anymore either. Might be they're testing out this feature and not all users get to see it.
yea i wonder if that's the case.
There are a few laws regarding fake reviews and review suppression in the states as well. So I'm almost wondering if it was the classic case of they started implementing something and then legal was like, yo, cut that shit out. That's not allowed.
But I still feel like it might be something to do with the push for removing explicit content from minors that every platform seems to be doing.