this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
664 points (99.1% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

46016 readers
776 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Happened to me when I saw a book on the US site, I wasn't able to see all reviews, but there was a button to sort-of "apply" to get approved for seeing all of them.

It took five days, then I got this email.

Interestingly, they're not doing this on the European site, you can still see all reviews there.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 227 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

EU laws probably prevent them from doing shady shit like this.

Hiding a review just makes me not want to buy it

[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 82 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

I also think they're more cautious about the EU. There are less consumer protection laws in the US, so they get fucked first.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 41 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

We don’t really have less laws. Just far less enforcement mechanisms. For instance I am supposed to be able to use my own modem, the FCC rules prevent ATT from forcing me to rent a modem. But the FCC hasn’t given a shit about anything since the 80s. So ATT forces me to rent a modem. Laws are only as good as their enforcement.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 28 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

My favorite example is the Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act, which requires manufacturers to honor warranty on products that you or a third party have worked on in the past unless the manufacturer can prove that the specific malfunction for which you're seeking warranty service was caused by the previous repair or modification.

Those "warranty void if removed" stickers are illegal.

It also prohibits manufacturers refusing to repair a product due to unrelated damage.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Wish I could go live in the EU

[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] moakley@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Somehow I doubt it's that easy.

It's not. I'm in the UK, and ever since brexit (spits) I've wanted an EU passport. Pre brexit, I spent several years in European countries, had a home, a job, friends, etc. I'd intended to do it again later in life, and now I can't. Different countries have varying levels of strictness in what they require, but it's just not feasible for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 111 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Took some digging but holy shit yeah this is real

[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 48 points 4 weeks ago

Thanks for confirming! That's the box I saw as well, after clicking on it it said I will get an email in five business days - and it really took the whole five days.

[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 58 points 4 weeks ago (11 children)

If you want to try it out yourself: This is the book where it happened. Despite that email I can see all of the reviews again, so maybe it's a feature they're testing out.

It's really shady to have a rating system and hide ratings within that system. Why have it at all then?

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 50 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember Amazon is owned by a billionaire or someone who is a part of the sociopathic class. They only want you to buy they don't give a shit about what you care about just pressing that buy now button. The laws are supposed to force them to care about the shit we care about but, everyone on this planet in politics is a corporate shill so tough luck.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

If you're talking about Bezos, he only owns 9% (or possibly even less now) of Amazon.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Huh til, it still is the source of his wealth, and the other 91% probably also goes mostly to rich assholes, however I'm sure the public will be holding the bag if Amazon ever goes down in valuation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] classic@fedia.io 28 points 4 weeks ago

Maybe it's lazy on my end, but my first guess is that it would be in order to prioritize and normalize the AI summary. Basically a dystopic move towards trust me bro

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 25 points 4 weeks ago

feature

"To improve the user experience we are hiding things that were one of the primary reasons we became a monopoly."

[–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 22 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

To manipulate the market, is the only answer I can come up with. Why else would they do this?

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 13 points 4 weeks ago

Making their massive collection of reviews only available to their shitty AI, I would suppose.

[–] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 9 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I tried from canada on amazon US same as you i have to “apply” to get more review a fast search show they do that since at least since middle of 2025 on “ products in categories with high competitive pressure and potentially manipulable reviews “

Still don’t make much senses

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 weeks ago

So that's actually interesting though. I'm not necessarily condoning this behavior. But if they have identified that unscrupulous, fraudulent outside parties are potentially manipulating the reviews, and that is what's causing Amazon to block the reviews, then that might actually be a beneficial move on their part. It's Amazon, so I'm inclined to think they are the ones behaving badly, but this is at least a possibility.

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 weeks ago

I'd wager it's to prevent other AI trainer bots from scraping the reviews

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] parson0@startrek.website 50 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Stop buying anything on Amazon

[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I haven't bought much from Amazon in years, but them being so prolific meant there were lots of reviews for me to read before buying the product somewhere else.

[–] parson0@startrek.website 4 points 4 weeks ago

Good idea actually

[–] tonyn@lemmy.ml 41 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

I'd bet this is a move to prevent their reviews from being used to train competing AI systems.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 34 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

I’ve used Amazon for many years. I hadn’t written a lot of reviews. Recently I’ve been getting a lot of shitty products. So I started writing bad reviews. Maybe others are doing the same now too.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

There's a lot of fakes mixed in with regular inventory because individual sellers can send their products to have Amazon fulfill orders for them and Amazon just mixes inventory all together. This is why I don't buy a lot of name brand stuff from Amazon, especially things like shampoo as you don't know what you're getting.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

They did actually stop co-mingling lately

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

Doesn't matter much in relation to reputational damage.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 4 weeks ago

Too late. That should have never been a thing in the first place. It's common sense that it would be a problem.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 28 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

There has been tons of products with fake reviews for over a decade as well by now.

I remember back when Amazon was a source for trustworthy products in the earlier days. Then they let the shady sellers in. Then they hid the country the product ships from. Then tolerated blatantly fake reviews. And now they're hiding the reviews they don't like? Why would anyone want to purchase anything from that service at that point?

If I want something I have to order online nowadays I'll go out of my way to find an online store that isn't Amazon. And if it's something I can't find anywhere else, I'd go on AliExpress. It's likely going to be a junk product but at least it's priced accordingly. Amazon products nowadays are just AliExpress products with a 5000% markup.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 4 weeks ago

Interestingly, they're not doing this on the European site, you can still see all reviews there.

I wonder why this might be…

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago

How bout you don't use fucking Amazon.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 4 weeks ago

Here in the UK they'll sometimes remove negative reviews as "off topic" anyway.

Reviews? Can't trust 'em.

[–] gigachad@piefed.social 14 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

There is a lot of stuff where it's hard to find alternatives to Amazon, but books aren't really one of those items. Ditch Amazon, support your local book store. Your prime membership pays for Jeff Bezos' next helicopter ride while his employees are pissing in bottles during shift or just lying around dead somewhere

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago

Stores everywhere...it's time to cut out the middleman (again). Getting an ecommerce website is not rocket science anymore.

[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago

They already only show positive reviews unless you login

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago

Wooooooow. This is some of the biggest bs i've ever seen.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 7 points 4 weeks ago

Interesting. See, what I did to make sure this doesn't happen is I simply stopped using amazon years ago

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

AI prevention?

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 weeks ago

I saw the same restriction on the Swedish site

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 4 points 4 weeks ago
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Amazon becoming like the Superstore.

load more comments
view more: next ›