this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
134 points (96.5% liked)

Selfhosted

60723 readers
231 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Any reason it wouldn't work with Emby too? Have had it since before there was a Jellyfin spun off so I've just rolled with it.

[–] TechSquidTV@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If Emby happens to have the same API surface as Jellyfin, you could use that. I doubt that works, I have not tried it.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Surprised people still stick with Emby.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lots of things work better, so I am not.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I went with Plex for probably ten years after breaking with Emby. I ended things with them because they don't care about their customers at all. Bugs that break the experience completely that lie untouched/unnoticed/ignored for years, and no replies from the developers. Or even developers that just stop replying to these bugs.

Switched to Jellyfin this year and it works like a charm. Only thing is it isn't as good at noticing duplicates in my library, but other than that, works just fine. Definitely above acceptable.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I do a lot of remote sharing with friends and unfortunately it's not great for that.

Also the last time I checked it out the clients kinda sucked. Not even one for Apple TV

[–] boeman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Swiftfin or infuse for AppleTV

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Huh? I watch my Jellyfin on AppleTV just fine.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe there was one added since I last checked, or I'm just dumb. Good chance of the latter.

Edit: oh, 3rd-party clients? I had tried one but they wanted a fucking subscription fee

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nope. No subscription fee. Just the regular Jellyfin client. I run the server from my PC and watch on the client in my TV. All free.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Will try again. Though not having stupid simple friend sharing is still a dealbreaker for me

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I tried it out while I was at a friends place (streaming remotely from two internet connections).
Even the sync play worked very well (the delay between pressing pause and it executing was about 1-1.5 seconds).
Almost better than watch2gether.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How were you connected from the remote connection to Jellyfin server?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I poked at Jelly a bit ago, but as I recall the auto organize was abandoned (kinda a big deal to me) and something about conversions being a problem. Basically I just didn't see anything that would make me inclined to go through the hassle of reworking what already works.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sure, I feel that. Are you running the version before they changed the license or whatever was the thing back then?

I'm lucky in my situation I guess, that I only need local playback and direct play.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 2 points 2 months ago

I'd gotten a lifetime premiere key, mostly for the ldap functionality at the time. Something I can buy once and use rather than subscribing to everything is always a winner for me.